以科学论证为导向实施科学探究教学被引量：2

Implementation of Scientific Inquiry Teaching Under the Guidance of Scientific Reasoning

下载PDF

导出

摘要科学论证能力是当前国际上科学教育的重要目标。科学论证能力对于学生自我概念的转变、科学思维的培养和科学探究的提效有着独特的教学价值。在课堂中开展以科学论证为导向的科学探究教学,能够改善探究活动的品质,有效地培养学生的科学论证能力。 Scienti c reasoning ability is the currently important goal of international science education, and it has a unique teaching value for students’ conversion in self-concepts, cultivation of their scientific thinking, and promoting efficiency of their scientific inquiry. Implementation of scientific inquiry teaching under the guidance of scientific reasoning in classroom can improve the quality of inquiry activities and e？ ectively cultivate students’ ability of scienti？ c reasoning.

作者许春良

机构地区无锡市东北塘实验小学教科室

出处《江苏教育研究》 2017年第10期76-79,共4页 Jiangsu Education Research

基金江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划课题"基于科学思维培养的小学科学课教学研究"(D/2013/02/081)的阶段性成果作者为课题主持人

关键词科学论证科学探究操作要点 scienti c reasoning scienti c inquiry operational point

分类号 G623 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1许春良,冷巨丰.科学思维:小学科学教学的价值追求[J].江苏教育研究,2014,0(6):28-31. 被引量：4
2张世成.探究教学中证据意识的培养[J].物理通报,2012,41(4):13-16. 被引量：7
3季薛庆.科学论证取向的实验教学探索[J].全球教育展望,2012,41(2):87-91. 被引量：6
4潘瑶珍.基于论证的科学教育[J].全球教育展望,2010,39(6):82-86. 被引量：37

二级参考文献42

1蔡德诚.要深化理解科学精神[N].科学时报,2002-11-06.
2Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J.Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms [J]. Science Education, 2000:84(3), 287-312.
3Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott. P. Young people' s images of science [ M ]. Philadephia: Open University Press, 1996.
4National Research Council. National science education standards [Z]. Washington: National Academy Press. 1996:113.
5Billig, M. Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
6Willard, C. A. A theory of argumentation[M]. The University of AlabamaPress, Tuscalcosa, 1989.
7Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. S. Fundamentals of argumentation theory[M]. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1996.
8Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation [ J ]. Learning and Instruction, 1991a: 1, 337 - 350.
9Emeren, F. H. V. A world of difference: The rich state of argumentation theory[J ]. Informal Logic, 1995 : 17(2), 144 - 158.
10Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A., & Liendo, G. Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances, and Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Atomic Structure [ J ]. Science Education, 2002 : 86(4), 505 - 525.