期刊文献+

基于互联网金融的创业企业融资优选模式研究 被引量:9

Study on Optimization Method of Internet Financing Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于预购众筹、P2P和股权众筹3种互联网金融模式的投融资决策过程,分别构建了投资者和创业企业(融资者)为决策主体的两阶段完全信息动态博弈模型,采用逆向选择法求取了纳什均衡,并分别详解了创业企业通过3种互联网融资渠道融资所获取的最优利润及其影响因素。研究发现,创业企业的融资目标金额、投资者获取的额外效用及收益贴现率是决定最优利润及其排序的关键指标。借助我国金融市场参数和互联网金融投资者偏好参数对收益贴现率和额外效用赋值后发现:随着创业企业融资目标金额的增加,创业企业为获取最优利润会依次优选预购众筹、P2P、股权众筹渠道进行融资。我国互联网金融平台的统计数据印证了这一结论。 This paper based on the investment and financing decision-making process of pre-ordering crowdfunding,P2 P and equity crowdfunding three kinds of Internet financial models,are constructed by investors and venture enterprises(financing)for the decision-making body of the dynamic game model of two stage incomplete information,we adopt the adverse selection method to get the Nash equilibrium,and explain the factors of the optimal profit and the influence of three kinds of Internet financing channels for financing obtained by enterprises. It is find that the financing target amount,the additional utility obtained by investors and the discount rate of earnings are the key indicators to determine the optimal profit and its sort. With the financial market parameters and Internet financial investor preference parameters in China on income discount rate and additional utility assignment find that with increasing financing target enterprise value,enterprise in order to obtain the optimal profit are preferred pre chips,P2 P mode,to raise public equity financing channels. Statistical data of China's Internet financial platform confirms this conclusion.
作者 王树强 王粲
出处 《工业技术经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第11期139-146,共8页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 河北省科技计划项目"促进京津冀产业对接与转移的思路与对策研究"(项目编号:15457634D) 河北省科学基金项目"京津冀环境治理协作中的河北省对策"(项目编号:HB14YJ083) 河北省高等学校人文社会科学项目研究"京津冀大气污染物排放权初始分配机制及我省对策研究"(项目编号:SD171046)
关键词 子博弈纳什均衡 P2P 预购众筹 股权众筹 互联网金融 融资 subgame Nash equilibrium model P2P pre-ordering crowdfunding equity crowdfunding internet nance financing
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献64

  • 1李钧.P2P借贷:性质、风险与监管[J].金融发展评论,2013(3):35-50. 被引量:84
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3137
  • 3Lin, M., N. R. Prabhala, and S. Viswanathan. Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Social Networks and Adverse Selection in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending[R]. 2009.
  • 4Klafft, M. Peer to Peer Lending: Auctioning Mirco Credits over the lnternet [R]. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Systems, Technology and Management(ICISTM 08), 2008.
  • 5Herzenstein, M., R. L. Andrews, U. M. Dholakia, and E. Lyandres. The Democratization of Personal Consumer Loans? Determinants of Success in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending Communities[R]. 2008.
  • 6Iyer, R., A. I. Khwaja, E. F. P. Luttmer, and K. Shue. Screening in New Credit Markets: Can Individual Lenders Infer Borrower Credit Worthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending[R]. 2010.
  • 7Ceyhan, S., X.L. Shi, and L. Jure. Dynamics of Bidding in a P2P Lending Service: Effects of Herding and Predicting Loan Success[J]. Social Network Analysis, 2011 ,(2).
  • 8Berkovich, E. Search and Herding Effects in Peer-to-Peer Lending: Evidence from Prosper.Com [J]. Annals of Finance, 2011,7(3).
  • 9Lee. E., and B. Lee. Herding Behavior in Online P2P Lending: An Empirical Investigation [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2012, (11).
  • 10Davis, K.E., and A. Gelpern. Peer-to-Peer Financing for Development Regulating the Intermediaries[R]. 2010.

共引文献528

同被引文献92

引证文献9

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部