期刊文献+

考虑容许沉降影响的群桩抗力系数和安全系数的可靠度设计 被引量:1

RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OF RESISTANCE FACTOR AND SAFETY FACTOR FOR PILE GROUP SYSTEM CONSIDERING LIMITING TOLERABLE SETTLEMENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用单桩可靠度设计方法,考虑群桩效应和系统效应的影响,提出基于沉降控制条件的群桩抗力系数和安全系数的可靠度设计方法。研究了土体性质、桩型、承台、系统效应和容许沉降等因素对群桩抗力系数和安全系数的影响。结果表明:群桩抗力系数随系统效应系数的增大而增大,系统效应越强,可采用较高的抗力系数进行群桩可靠度设计;群桩抗力系数随容许沉降的增加而增大,但增长幅度逐渐减小,随容许沉降条件的放宽,群桩抗力系数设计依赖于承载力因素而非沉降因素;无黏性土、低承台条件下群桩抗力系数设计值大于黏性土、高承台条件下群桩抗力系数设计值;安全系数随系统效应系数的增大而减小,随容许沉降条件的放宽而降低。 According to the reliability design method of single piles and taking into account pile group effstiidy presented the reliability design methiod for the resistance factor and safety factor of pile group based quirements. Meanwhile, it is studied the impact of soil properties, pile types, pile cap types, system effect, and tlement on the resistance factor and safety factor of pile group. The following conclusions can be drawn from the resistance factor of pile group increased witli the system fect factor. The large resistance factor can be accepted for the reliability de-sign of pile group when there existed the strong system ] fect . Second, the resistance factor of pile group increased witli the limiting tol -erable settlement altliough the increase rate graduaiy diminished. Withi softening the limiting tolerable settlement requirements the re-sistance factor design of pile group depended on the bearing capacity requirements rathier design resistance factor of pile group under the condition of cohesionless soils and ground contact caps was larger than that under the condition of cohesive soils and freestanding caps. Finaiy, the safety factor of pile group decreased witii the system efect factor and re-duced witii softening the limiting tolerable settlement requirements.
出处 《南阳理工学院学报》 2017年第2期40-46,共7页 Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51608177) 河南省科技攻关计划项目(152102310223)
关键词 群桩 可靠度 容许沉降 抗力系数 安全系数 pile group reliability limiting tolerable settlement resistance factor safety factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1李典庆.打入桩承载力确定方法对安全系数的影响[J].岩土力学,2006,27(10):1733-1738. 被引量:8
  • 2周建方,李典庆.采用不同失效准则的桩基可靠度分析[J].岩土力学,2007,28(3):540-543. 被引量:5
  • 3JGJ94-2008建筑桩基技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
  • 4PHOON K K, KULHAWY F H. Characterization of model uncertainties for laterally loaded rigid drilled shafts[J]. Geoteehnique, 2005, 55(1): 45-54.
  • 5PHOON K K. Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: computations and applications[M]. London: Taylor & Francis, 2008.
  • 6DITHINDE M, PHOON K K, DE WET M, et al. Characterization of model uncertainty in the static pile design formula[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(1 ): 70 - 85.
  • 7PHOON K K, SANTOSO A, QUEK S T. Probabilistic analysis of soil-water characteristic curves[J]. Journal of Geoteehnieal and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 445-455.
  • 8NATAF A. Determination des distributions de probabilite dont les marges sont donn6es[J]. Comptes Rendus de l'Academle des Sciences, 1962, 225: 42-43.
  • 9LEBRUN R, DUTFOY A. A generalization of the Nataf transformation to distributions with elliptical Copula[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 24(2): 172 -178.
  • 10LEBRUN R, DUTFOY A. Do Rosenblatt and Natafisoprobabilistic transformations really differ[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 24(4): 577 -584.

共引文献43

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部