期刊文献+

LISS钢板与解剖钢板治疗股骨髁上骨折的临床疗效以及对膝关节功能的影响分析 被引量:1

Efficacy of LISS plus anatomical plate on supracondylar fracture and knee function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨LISS钢板与解剖钢板治疗股骨髁上骨折的临床疗效以及对膝关节功能的影响。方法:2013年1月-2014年6月,我院手术治疗股骨髁上骨折患者80例,随机分为LISS板组和解剖板组。观察两组患者手术时间、术中出血量,术后VAS疼痛评分、骨折愈合时间以及术后膝关节3、6和12个月的HSS评分。结果:LISS板组患者平均手术时间长于解剖板组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LISS板组患者术中出血量、术后VAS疼痛评分、骨折愈合时间均优于解剖板组(P<0.05)。术后3个月和6个月LISS板组的膝关节HSS评分明显高于解剖板组患者(P<0.05)。术后12个月两组患者膝关节HSS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:LISS钢板治疗股骨髁上骨折具有出血量少,术后疼痛轻和骨折愈合快的特点,并且有利于早期膝关节的功能康复。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of LISS plate and anatomical plate on supracondylar fracture and knfunction. Methods: 80 patients were randomly divided into the LISS group and anatomical plate group. The operative time, intraoperatiblood loss, postoperative VAS pain score, fracture healing time and HSS scores of the knee joint in 3, 6 and 12 months were observeResults: The average operative time in the LISS group was longer (P〈0.05). The intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative VAS pain scoand fracture healing time in the LISS group were signifcantly better than those in the anatomical group (P〈0.05). The HSS score of tknee in the LISS group was signifcantly higher than that in the anatomical group in 3 and 6 months (P〈0.05). There was no signifcadiference of knee HSS between two groups in 12 months (P〉0.05). Conclusion: LISS plate has the characteristics of less bleeding, lepostoperative pain and faster fracture healing, and is benefcial to functional rehabilitation of knee.
作者 吴昌桓
出处 《中医临床研究》 2017年第25期109-110,共2页 Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词 股骨髁上骨折 LISS钢板 解剖钢板 HSS评分 Supracondylar fracture LISS plate Anatomical plate HSS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1Muller ME ,Allgower M.骨科内固定[M].3版.荣国威,翟桂华,刘沂,等译.北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.306.
  • 2Neer CS2nd, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1967,49 (4) :591 - 613.
  • 3Neubaner T, Ritter E, Potschka T. Retrograde nailing of femoral frac- tures[ J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Ceeh, 2008,75 ( 3 ) : 158 - 166.
  • 4Assari S, Kaufmann A, Darvish K, et al. Biomechanieal comparison of locked plating and spiral blade retrograde nailing of supracondylar femur fractures[ J]. Injury,2013,44(10) : 1340 - 1345.
  • 5Paller DJ, Frenzen SW, Bartlett CS 3rd. A three-dimensional compar- ison of intramedullacy nail constructs for osteopenic supracondylar fe- mur fractures [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma,2013,27 (2) :93 - 99.
  • 6Granata JD, Litsky AS, Lustenberger DP. Immediate weight bearing of eomminuted supracondylar femur fractures using locked plate fixa- tion[J]. Orthopedics,2012,35 (8) :e1210 - e1213.
  • 7Helfet DL, Lorieh DG. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of supra- condylar femoral fractures[ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998 ( 350 ) : 80 - 84.
  • 8Rieci W. Classification and treatment of periprosthetie supraeondylar femur fractures[ J]. J Knee Surg,2013,26( 1 ) :9 - 14.
  • 9Large TM, Kellam JF, Bosse M.L Locked plating of supracondylar periprosthetie femur fractures [ J ]. J Arthropiasty, 2008,23 ( 6 Suppl 1) :115 - 120.
  • 10Horneff JG 3rd, Scolaro JA. Intramedullary nailing versus locked plate for treating supraeondylar periprosthetie femur fractures [ J ]. Orthopedics ,2013,36(5 ) : e.561 - e.566.

共引文献10

同被引文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部