期刊文献+

流程化沟通模式结合微信随访对肺结核并发2型糖尿病患者的护理效果观察 被引量:15

Nursing effect of CICARE model of communication combined with WeChat for follow-up of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis' s observation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨运用流程化沟通模式(CICARE model of communication,CICARE)结合微信随访教育对肺结核并发2型糖尿病患者实施护理的效果.方法 选取2016年1月1日至6月1日新疆维吾尔自治区胸科医院住院治疗的80例肺结核并发2型糖尿病患者,按照随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(40例)和实验组(40例).对照组患者在住院期间及出院后6个月均给予常规健康教育;实验组患者在对照组常规健康教育的基础上,住院期间辅以流程化沟通模式对患者开展健康教育工作,出院后加用微信随访6个月.比较两组患者入院时与出院6个月后的健康知识知晓情况、一般自我效能感评分、治疗依从性等方面的差异.通过SPSS 17.0软件分析数据,计数资料用频数和百分比表示,率的比较采用卡方检验;计量资料用“(x)±s”表示,均数的比较采用t检验;均以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果 干预6个月后实验组在消毒隔离(75.0%,30/40)、疾病知识(62.5%,25/40)、治疗方法(70.0%,28/40)、药物相关知识(87.5%,35/40)、饮食与休息(75.0%,30/40)等方面的知晓率及总知晓率(74.0%,148/200)均高于对照组(17.5%,7/40;20.0%,8/40;30.0%,12/40;25.0%,10/40;37.5%,15/40;26.0%,52/200)(x2值分别为26.60、14.91、12.80、31.75、11.43、92.16,P值均<0.001).实验组在消毒隔离[(13.10±2.53)分]、疾病知识[(15.33±2.71)分]、治疗方法[(15.90±1.72)分]、药物相关知识[(14.63±2.37)分]、饮食与休息[(16.10±1.98)分]等方面的得分均高于对照组[(11.80±2.04)分、(14.08±2.30)分、(14.25±2.06)分、(13.03±2.07)分、(14.45±2.69)分](t=2.53,P=0.013;t=2.22,P=0.029;t=3.89,P=0.001;t=3.22,P=0.002;t=3.12,P=0.003).实验组干预6个月后一般自我效能感评分[(20.38±3.41)分]高于对照组[(18.77±3.17)分](t=2.17,P=0.032);实验组在饮食干预(60.0%,24/40)、药物治疗(67.5%,27/40)、自我监测(80.0%,32/40)、戒烟戒酒(60.0%,24/40)方面的依从率及总的依从率(63.8%,153/240)高于对照组[37.5%,15/40;45.0%,18/40;50.0%,20/40;35.0%,14/40;42.1%,101/240](x2=4.05,P=0.044;x2 =4.11,P=0.043;x2=7.91,P=0.005;x2=5.01,P=0.025;x2=22.61,P=0.000).结论 应用流程化沟通模式结合微信平台的沟通和传播功能,可以提高新疆地区肺结核并发2型糖尿病患者的认知水平和自我护理能力,并且有利于疾病控制,从而提高临床治疗效果. Objective To explore the nursing effect of CICARE model of communication combined with WeChat for follow-up of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis's observation.Methods Eighty type 2 diabetes mellitus patients complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Chest Hospital between January 1,2016 and June 1,2016 were randomly divided into control group (n=40) and experimental group (n=40).Patients in the control group were given routine health education during hospitalization and after discharge.As to patients in experimental group,they were additionally given CICARE mode of communication during hospitalization and were followed up for 6 months with WeChat.The differences of health knowledge,general self-efficacy score and treatment compliance between the two groups were compared using SPSS 17.0.Counting data are expressed by frequency and percentages,measuring data were recorded as "(x)±s".The Chi-square test was used to compare the rates of the two groups.The difference was statistically significant when P〈0.05.Results Six months after the intervention,the disinfection and isolation (75.0%,30/40),knowledge of the disease (62.5%,25/40),treatment (70.0%,28/40),drug related knowledge (87.5%,35/40),diet and rest (75.0%,30/40) and other aspects of the awareness rate of experimental group in were higher than those of the control group (17.5%,7/40;20.0%,8/40;30.0%,12/40;25.0%,10/40;37.5%,15/40)(Chi-square were 26.60,14.91,12.80,31.75 and 11.43,respectively;all P〈0.01).Scores of experimental group in the disinfection and isolation (13.10± 2.53),disease knowledge (15.33 ± 2.71),treatment (15.90±1.72),drug related knowledge (14.63±2.37) and diet and rest (16.10± 1.98) were higher than those of the control group ((11.80±2.04),(14.08±±2.30),(14.25±2.06),(13.03±2.07) and (14.45±2.69),respectively)(t=2.53,P=0.013;t=2.22,P=0.029;t=3.89,P=0.001;t=3.22,P=0.002;t=3.12,P=0.003).After the intervention for 6 months,the general self-efficacy score (20.38± 3.41) was higher than that of the control group (18.77± 3.17) (t=2.17,P =0.032).The diet intervention (60.0%,24/40),drug therapy (67.5%,27/40),self monitoring (80.0%,32/40),smoking and drinking (60.0%,24/40) of experimental group are higher than those in the control group (37.5% (15/40),45.0% (18/40),50.0% (20/40),35.0% (14/40)) (x2 =4.05,P=0.044;x2=4.11,P=0.043;x2=7.91,P=0.005;x2=5.01,P=0.025).Conclusion The application of CICARE model of communication combined with WeChat could improve the patients' cognitive level and self-care ability,and is conducive to disease control,to improve clinical treatment.
作者 何丽芸 张国明 黄琴 赵艳君 陈卫星 金红兵 彭巧君 HE Li-yun ZHANG Guo-ming HUANG Qin ZHAO Yan-jun CHEN Wei-xing JIN Hong-bing PENG Qiao-jun(Operating Room, the First Affiliated Hospi- tal of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, Chin)
出处 《中国防痨杂志》 CAS 2017年第10期1055-1062,共8页 Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2015211C061) 新疆医科大学研究生创新创业项目(CXCY054)
关键词 糖尿病 2型 结核 护理信息学 模型 护理学 信息交流 护理教育研究 Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Tuberculosis, pulmonary Nursing informaties Models, nur-sing Communication Nursing education research
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献95

  • 1王磊,李晓梅,马依彤,刘芬,袁山,潘硕,彭潇,孙明慧.2010年新疆福海地区哈萨克族居民糖尿病及空腹血糖受损患病率调查[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2010,2(6). 被引量:10
  • 2梁月新.初治肺结核并发2型糖尿病胰岛素强化治疗的护理[J].现代护理,2006,12(12):1120-1122. 被引量:2
  • 3李锐,卢伟,贾伟平,黎衍云,施亮,刘美霞,耿国柱,傅华,施榕,史君衡,史虹莉,张胜年.上海市2型糖尿病患病情况现状调查[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(24):1675-1680. 被引量:105
  • 4唐丹,邹君,申继亮.老年人一般自我效能感的影响因素[J].中国老年学杂志,2006,26(11):1451-1453. 被引量:51
  • 5卫生部疾病预防控制局,卫生部医政司,中国疾病预防控制中心.中国结核病防治规范实施工作指南[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009:10-53.
  • 6何斌.访斯坦福医院有感-CICARE模式介绍[EB/OL].[2011-11-16].http://www.e5413.com/NewsMessage-9048.aspx.
  • 7Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med, 2010,362 : 1090-1101.
  • 8Claudi T,Midthjell K, Holmen J, et al. Cardiovascular disease and risk actors in persons with type 2 diabetes diagnosed in a large population screening: the Nord-Trondelag Diabetes Study Norway. J Interm Med, 2000,248 : 492-500.
  • 9PACHI A, BRATIS D, MOUSSAS G, et ai. Psychiatric morbidity and other factors affecting treatment adherencein puhnonary tuber- culosis patients [ J ]. Tuberc Res Treat, 2013, 2013 : 489865.
  • 10van den Boogaard J, Boeree MJ, Kibiki GS, et al. The complex- ity of the adherence-response relationship in tuberculosis treat ment: why are we still in the dark and how can we get out? Trop Med Int Health,2011,16(6) :693-698.

共引文献184

同被引文献129

引证文献15

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部