期刊文献+

Interventional Bronchoscopic Therapy in Adult Patients with Tracheobronchial Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma 被引量:8

Interventional Bronchoscopic Therapy in Adult Patients with Tracheobronchial Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Tracheobronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare airway tumor in adults for which surgery is considered a first-line treatment. However, some patients already lost the best opportunity of a surgical intervention when diagnoses are confirmed, and surgery causes considerable trauma resulting in partial loss of pulmonary function. Moreover, the tumor is resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These factors make the treatment of tracheobronchial MEC challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and et^cacy ofinterventional bronchoscopic therapy in adult patients with tracheobronchial MEC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical manifestations, bronchoscopic interventions, complications, and outcomes of 11 adult patients with tracheobronchial MEC. Paired t-test was used to analyze the parameters of the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Index and the Karnofsky Score before and after the first interventional bronchoscopic therapy. Results: All tumors occurred in the main bronchus and were easily visualized by bronchoscopy. After interventional bronchoscopic therapy, the symptoms of all patients showed significant improvement. The American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Index decreased from 1.91 ± 1.22 to 0.27 ± 0.47 (t = 6.708, P 〈 0.001) and the Kamofsky Score increased from 78.18 ±16.62 to 95.46 ± 8.20 (t =-5.190, P 〈 0.001 ). Bronchoscopic intervention did not result in serious complications or mortality. During the follow-up period between 3 and 96 months after the first therapy, the following results were noted: ( 1 ) among the eight patients with low-grade tracheobronchial MEC, only one patient had a relapse and agreed to surgical treatment; (2) among the three patients with high-grade tracheobronchial MEC, one patient required repeated bronchoscopic interventions, one patient died of pulmonary infection, and one patient died of systemic failure owing to tumor metastasis. Conclusions: Interventional bronchoscopic therapy, as an alternative treatment, shows promise in some adult patients with low-grade tracheobronchial MEC confined to the bronchus. However, for adult patients with high-grade tracheobronchial MEC, early diagnosis and surgical treatment are still strongly recommended. Background: Tracheobronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare airway tumor in adults for which surgery is considered a first-line treatment. However, some patients already lost the best opportunity of a surgical intervention when diagnoses are confirmed, and surgery causes considerable trauma resulting in partial loss of pulmonary function. Moreover, the tumor is resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These factors make the treatment of tracheobronchial MEC challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and et^cacy ofinterventional bronchoscopic therapy in adult patients with tracheobronchial MEC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical manifestations, bronchoscopic interventions, complications, and outcomes of 11 adult patients with tracheobronchial MEC. Paired t-test was used to analyze the parameters of the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Index and the Karnofsky Score before and after the first interventional bronchoscopic therapy. Results: All tumors occurred in the main bronchus and were easily visualized by bronchoscopy. After interventional bronchoscopic therapy, the symptoms of all patients showed significant improvement. The American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Index decreased from 1.91 ± 1.22 to 0.27 ± 0.47 (t = 6.708, P 〈 0.001) and the Kamofsky Score increased from 78.18 ±16.62 to 95.46 ± 8.20 (t =-5.190, P 〈 0.001 ). Bronchoscopic intervention did not result in serious complications or mortality. During the follow-up period between 3 and 96 months after the first therapy, the following results were noted: ( 1 ) among the eight patients with low-grade tracheobronchial MEC, only one patient had a relapse and agreed to surgical treatment; (2) among the three patients with high-grade tracheobronchial MEC, one patient required repeated bronchoscopic interventions, one patient died of pulmonary infection, and one patient died of systemic failure owing to tumor metastasis. Conclusions: Interventional bronchoscopic therapy, as an alternative treatment, shows promise in some adult patients with low-grade tracheobronchial MEC confined to the bronchus. However, for adult patients with high-grade tracheobronchial MEC, early diagnosis and surgical treatment are still strongly recommended.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第20期2453-2458,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 ADULT BRONCHOSCOPY BRONCHUS Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Adult Bronchoscopy Bronchus Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1党斌温,张杰.局部麻醉及支气管软镜下氩气刀治疗中心气道阻塞性病变的安全性[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(11):767-768. 被引量:29
  • 2Bolliger CT, Mathur PN, Beamis JF, et al. ERS/ATS statement on interventional pulmonology Europen Respiratory Socienty American Thoracic Society. Eur Respir J, 2002, 19:356-373.
  • 3Reichle G, Freitag L, Kullmann H J, et al. Argon plasma coagulation in bronchology : a new method-alternative or complementary? Pnieumologie ,2000,54:508-516.
  • 4Avanesian AA, Shcherbakov AM, Arsen' ev AI. An experience with argon-plasma coagulation in endoscopic management of obstructive tumors of the trachea and main bronchi. Vopr Onkol, 2004,50:459-461.
  • 5Yasuo M, Tanabe T, Tsushima K, et al. Endobronchial argon plasma coagulation for the management of post-intubation tracheal stenosis. Respirology,2006, 11:659- 662.
  • 6白冲,李强,徐浩,董宇超,王琴.经纤维支气管镜氩离子凝固治疗气道狭窄[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2003,26(7):424-424. 被引量:36

共引文献11

同被引文献36

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部