期刊文献+

斜向腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效 被引量:8

Clinical outcomes of oblique lumber interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨应用斜向腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法 :对2015年10月~2016年5月应用斜向腰椎椎间融合术治疗的24例腰椎退行性疾病患者进行回顾性分析,男8例,女16例,年龄44~88岁,平均62.3±12.0岁,手术节段36节。观察手术时间、出血量、术后并发症,比较术前、术后1周、末次随访时腰痛JOA评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)情况及X线片上手术节段椎间隙高度(intervertebral disc height,IDH)和椎间孔高度(intervertebral foramen height,IFH)变化。结果 :平均手术时间135±21.0min(100~170min),平均术中出血量163.3±54.9ml(100~300ml)。平均随访时间15.8±2.2个月(13~20个月)。末次随访时7例患者发生融合器下沉,下沉节段10节,其中2例患者未行后路椎弓根螺钉固定,2例患者术中有明确终板损伤;3例出现一过性大腿前方疼痛,1例出现下肢乏力,1周后恢复正常。所有患者症状在随访过程中均逐渐改善,术前、术后1周及末次随访时平均腰痛JOA评分分别为11.2±1.9、19.4±1.3、25.0±0.72,术后1周与末次随访与术前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01);平均ODI分别为(68.5±5.9)%、(45.6±5.65)%、(12.2±5.1)%,术后1周与末次随访与术前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01);平均椎间隙高度分别为9.16±2.7mm、12.7±2.6mm、10.8±3.0mm,术后1周与术前比较有统计学差异(P<0.01),末次随访与术前比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);平均椎间孔高度16.9±3.7mm、20.7±3.7mm、18.1±4.2mm,术后1周与术前比较有统计学差异(P<0.01),末次随访与术前比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:斜向腰椎椎间融合术近期疗效好、安全性高,能有效治疗腰椎退行性疾病,远期疗效还需经过大样本长期的随访和研究。 Objectives: To analyze the clinical outcomes of oblique lumber interbody fusion(OLIF) in treating lumbar degenerative disease. Methods: 24 cases were selected who had lumbar degenerative disease and treated with oblique lumber interbody fusion between October 2015 and May 2016. The operations were per-formed in 36 segments of 8 males and 16 females, with an average age of 62.3±12.0(range, 44-88) years old.Lumbar function was evaluated according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) score and Oswestry dis-ability index(ODI). The intervertebral disc height(IDH) and intervertebral foramen height(IFH) were measured on lumbar plane X-ray before surgery, 1 week after surgery and at final follow-up after operation. The opera-tion time, blood loss and postoperative complication were observed, and then the causes were analyzed. Results: The mean operation time was 135 ±21.0 minutes(100-170 minutes); and the mean blood loss was163.3±54.9 ml(100-300 ml). The average follow-up time was 15.8 ±2.2 months(13-20 months). 7 cases(10 segments) occurred cage subsidence, 2 of them were not placed posterior pedicle screw fixation, and 2 of them had intra-operative end plate damage. 3 cases experienced transient pain in the front of legs and 1 case low-er limbs weakness, but recovered 1 week later. The clinical outcomes of all the patients improved during the follow-up. Before surgery, 1 week after surgery and at final follow-up, the mean JOA scores were 11.2 ±1.9,19.4±1.3, 25.0±0.72, the mean ODI scores were(68.5±5.9)%,(45.6±5.65)%,(12.2±5.1)%, respectively. All the clinical outcomes after surgery improved significantly comparing with those before surgery(P〈0.01). At the three time points, the mean IDH was 9.16±2.7 mm, 12.7±2.6 mm, 10.8±3.0 mm, the mean IFH was 16.9±3.7 mm,20.7±3.7 mm, 18.1±4.2 mm. The radiographic outcomes at 1 week after surgery improved significantly comparing with those before surgery(P〈0.01), and the outcomes of final follow-up did not improved significantly comparing with those before surgery(P〈0.05). Conclusions: Oblique lumber interbody fusion has satisfying and safe short-term outcomes in lumbar degenerative disease. Further follow-up and research is needed to access the long-term outcomes.
作者 郑晓青 顾宏林 梁国彦 庄见雄 尹东 刘斌 昌耘冰 ZHENG Xiaoqing GU Honglin LIANG Guoyan et al(Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China)
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期817-822,共6页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 广东省省级科技计划项目(编号:2014A020212402)
关键词 斜向腰椎椎间融合术 腰椎退行性疾病 临床疗效 Oblique lumber interbody fusion Lumbar degenerative disease Clinical outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1Anand N,Rosemann R,Khalsa B,et al.Mid-term to longterm clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis[J].Neurosurg Focus,2010,28(3):E6,.
  • 2Le TV,Uribe JS.Spine surgery[M].Croatia:In Tech,201279-96.
  • 3Mundis GM,Akbarnia BA,Phillips FM.Adult deformity co rection through minimally invasive lateral approach technique[J].Spine,2010,35(26 Suppl):S312-S321.
  • 4Shen FH,Samartzis D,Khanna AJ,et al.Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions[J].Orthop Clin North Am,2007,38:373-386.
  • 5Ozgur BM,Aryan HE,Pimenta L,et al.Extreme lateral inter body fusion(XLIF):a novel surgical techniquefor anterior lum bar interbody fusion[J].Spine J,2006,6(4):435-443.
  • 6Silvestre C,Mac-Thiong JM,Hilmi R,et al.Complication and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumba interbody fusion:oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 pa tients[J].Asian Spine J,2012,6(2):89-97.
  • 7Kreiner DS,Shaffer WO,Baisden JL,et al.An evidencebased clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of de generative lumbar spinal stenosis(update)[J].Spine J,201313(7):734-743.
  • 8Arnold PM,Anderson,RA Mcguire.The lateral transpsoas ap proach to the lumbar and thoracic spine:a review[J].Surg Neurol Int,2012,3(3 Suppl 3):S198-S215.
  • 9Vaccaro AR,Kepler CK,Rihn JA,et al.Anatomical rela tionships of the anterior blood vessels to the lower lumba intervertebral discs:analysis based on magnetic resonance imaging of patients in the prone position[J].J Bone Join Surg Am,2012,94(12):1088-1094.
  • 10Rodgers WB,Gerber EJ,Patterson J.Intraoperative and early postoperative complicationsin extreme lateral interbody fusion[J].Spine,2011,36(1):26-32.

共引文献8

同被引文献48

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部