期刊文献+

阅读青年:在理解中解释在解释中建构——从《青春奥秘:青年的历史存在与社会角色》说起

Reading Youth:Explaining on Understanding and Constructing on Explaining——Based on Youth Mystery:Youth's Historical Existence and Social Role
原文传递
导出
摘要 近40年来,人们在推进青年研究蓬勃发展的同时,也面临着一些深层次困惑。这些困惑主要包括:研究"有增长无发展"的窠臼之困、研究零散化断裂化之困、研究缺乏"元理论"支撑之困、研究的政策性偏好之困等。青年研究者面临着的这些困境,从实质上看关乎如何阅读青年的问题。谢昌逵《青春奥秘:青年的历史存在与社会角色》正是基于青年的主体立场,致力于走入"他者"的世界,用"他者"的眼光拥抱历史中的青年与青年中的历史。对于青年研究的方法论转型,《青春奥秘:青年的历史存在与社会角色》具有重要的认识论和方法论意义。它启示青年研究者们:要准确把握青年研究学科化建设与青年研究基础理论的关系;要实现田野个案与叙事表达的结合;要实现从宏大话语向微观叙事的转型。 In the past 40 years,people faced some difficulties in the process of promoting the youth research development: the researches are many but without much development; the researches are scattered and discontinued; the researches lack the support of the meta-theories; and the researches are affected by policies. The focus of the headaches youth scholars faced is related to the problem of how to read youth. Xie Changkui's scholarly work "Youth Mystery: Youth's Historical Existence and Social Role"is based on the youth,written to go into the "Others"world and observe the youth in history and the history of the young from the "Others"perspective. His work is extraordinarily important to the epistemology and methodology transformation of the youth research. It inspires the youth scholars to accurately grasp the relationship between the discipline construction and the fundamental theories of youth research,combines individual case and narrative expression,and pushes the transformation from mass macroscopical structure to microcosmic utterance.
作者 黄海 舒隽 Huang Hai Shu Jun
出处 《青年学报》 2017年第4期14-19,共6页 Youth Research
关键词 青年研究 困惑 转型 youth research confusion transformation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1[2]张光志.社会科学学科词典[M].北京:中国青年出版社,1990.
  • 2[6]F·马赫列尔.青年问题和青年学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1986.
  • 3[13]C.Geertz.The Social History in an Indonsian Town,Canbridge,1995.
  • 4单光鼐.青年研究动向的回顾与评述[J].北京青年论坛(创刊号),1991,(12).
  • 5[1]Katz ,J. 1983. "A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Soclal System of Analytical Fieldwork," in Emerson, R,ed. , Contemporary Field Research, Waveland Press.
  • 6[3]成伯清.叙事与社会学[C].中国社会学会年会论文,2005.
  • 7[7]Weber, M. 1949. Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press. Whyte. M. 1989. "Who hates Bureaucacy?" in Stark, D& Nee, V ( ed), Remaking the Socialist Economic Institutions. Stanford University Press.
  • 8[10]邓金.解释性交往行动主义[M].周勇译.重庆大学出版社,2004.
  • 9[12]柏格.社会学导引--人文取向的透视[M].黄树仁等译.台湾:巨流图书公司,1982.
  • 10[13]柏格和卢格曼.知识社会学:社会实体的建构[M].邹理民译.台湾:巨流图书公司,1991.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部