护理科研成果评价指标的实证研究

An empirical study on evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements

[目的]对构建的护理科研成果评价指标进行实证研究。[方法]随机选择有基金资助的122项临床护理科研成果,调查其临床应用情况,并运用护理科研成果评价指标对成果进行评价。[结果]122项临床护理科研成果中,临床护理科研成果已推广应用101项(82.79%),但多为小范围内推广应用;已应用的临床护理科研成果总评分(39.79分±3.93分)高于未应用者(30.24分±3.90分),有培训经历的成果完成人的临床护理科研成果总评分(39.19分±4.98分)高于无培训经历者(37.03分±5.50分),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);影响科研成果应用前3位的因素是资金因素(22.14%)、管理因素(20.05%)和成果因素(17.48%)。[结论]前期构建的护理科研成果评价指标可以科学、有效的评价临床护理科研成果的水平、价值和效益。

Objective：To carry out an empirical study on evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements.Methods：A total of 122 funded clinical nursing research results were selected randomly,to investigate their clinical applications situation,and evaluate the outcomes using the evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievement.Results：In the 122 clinical nursing scientific research achievement results,clinical nursing scientific research achievements had been popularized and applied in 101 items（82.79%）,but most of them were popularized and applied in a small area.The total score of clinical nursing scientific research achievements （30.79＆#177;3.93 points） was higher than that without application（30.24＆#177;3.90）.The total score of clinical nursing scientific research achievement of authers with training experience （39.19＆#177;4.98） was higher than that of authers without training （37.03＆#177;5.50）,The differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.The 3 factors that affected the application of scientific research achievements were capital factor （22.14%）,management factor （20.05%） and achievement factor （17.48%）.Conclusions：The evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements constructed in the early stage could evaluate the level,value and benefit of clinical nursing scientific research achievements scientifically and effectively.