期刊文献+

护理科研成果评价指标的实证研究 被引量:4

An empirical study on evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]对构建的护理科研成果评价指标进行实证研究。[方法]随机选择有基金资助的122项临床护理科研成果,调查其临床应用情况,并运用护理科研成果评价指标对成果进行评价。[结果]122项临床护理科研成果中,临床护理科研成果已推广应用101项(82.79%),但多为小范围内推广应用;已应用的临床护理科研成果总评分(39.79分±3.93分)高于未应用者(30.24分±3.90分),有培训经历的成果完成人的临床护理科研成果总评分(39.19分±4.98分)高于无培训经历者(37.03分±5.50分),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);影响科研成果应用前3位的因素是资金因素(22.14%)、管理因素(20.05%)和成果因素(17.48%)。[结论]前期构建的护理科研成果评价指标可以科学、有效的评价临床护理科研成果的水平、价值和效益。 Objective:To carry out an empirical study on evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements.Methods:A total of 122 funded clinical nursing research results were selected randomly,to investigate their clinical applications situation,and evaluate the outcomes using the evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievement.Results:In the 122 clinical nursing scientific research achievement results,clinical nursing scientific research achievements had been popularized and applied in 101 items(82.79%),but most of them were popularized and applied in a small area.The total score of clinical nursing scientific research achievements (30.79&#177;3.93 points) was higher than that without application(30.24&#177;3.90).The total score of clinical nursing scientific research achievement of authers with training experience (39.19&#177;4.98) was higher than that of authers without training (37.03&#177;5.50),The differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).The 3 factors that affected the application of scientific research achievements were capital factor (22.14%),management factor (20.05%) and achievement factor (17.48%).Conclusions:The evaluation indicators of nursing scientific research achievements constructed in the early stage could evaluate the level,value and benefit of clinical nursing scientific research achievements scientifically and effectively.
作者 程金莲 谭茜
出处 《护理研究(中旬版)》 2017年第8期2847-2851,共5页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 山西省卫生厅科技攻关项目 编号:201301008
关键词 临床护理 科研成果 评价指标 基金资助 推广应用 影响因素 clinical nursing scientific research achievement evaluation indicators fund support popularization and application influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献185

共引文献89

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部