期刊文献+

药物性肝损害治疗的比较研究 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较异甘草酸镁、还原型谷胱甘肽、多烯磷脂酰胆碱治疗药物性肝损害的效果。方法本试验采开放式、随机、对照的方法进行研究。90例Ⅲ~Ⅳ度药物性肝损害的患者随机分成A组、B组、C组(异甘草酸镁、还原型谷胱甘肽、多烯磷脂酰胆碱组);各组患者均给予相应的保肝处理,定期评价肝功能。结果入组病例中A组完成30例、B组完成30例、C组完成29例。A组、B组、C组患者治疗后肝功好转的差异有统计学意义(χ2=21.657,P<0.0001)。三种药物保肝效果比较:A组与C组等效,优于B组。三种药物副反应轻微可耐受。结论与还原型谷胱甘肽相比,异甘草酸镁、多烯磷脂酰胆碱均能明显改善药物性肝损害,且两者改善药物性肝损害的作用相当。
作者 罗冬生
出处 《海峡药学》 2017年第10期130-132,共3页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1盛家琦.中药首乌所致家族性急性肝损害[J].中华肝脏病杂志,1998,6(1):59-59.
  • 2Benichou C. Criteria of drug-induced liver disorder. Report of an international consensus meeting. J Hepatol , 1990, 11: 272-276.
  • 3Danan G, Benichou C. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs- I . A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries. J Clin Epidemiol , 1993,46 : 1323-1330.
  • 4Larrey D. Epidemiology and individual susceptibility to adverse drug reactions affecting the liver. Semin Liver Dis, 2002, 22:145-155.
  • 5Benichou C, Danan G , Flahanult A. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs-Ⅱ. An original method for validation of drug causality assessment methods: case reports with positive rechallenge. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1331-1336.
  • 6Nierenberg DW. "Did this drug cause my patient' hepatitis?"and related questions. Ann Intern Med ,2002,136:480-483.
  • 7Aithal GP, Rawlins MD, Day CP. Accuracy of hepatic adverse drug reaction reporting in one English health region. BMJ,1999,319:1541.
  • 8叶维法.临床肝胆病学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,2002:723-724.
  • 9Larrey D. Epidemiology and individual susceptibility to adverse drug reactions affecting the liver. Semin Liver Dis, 2002, 22: 145-155.
  • 10Amacher DE. Serum transaminase elevations as indicators of hepatic injury following the administration of drugs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 1998, 27:119-130.

共引文献411

同被引文献71

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部