期刊文献+

驾驶行为量表(中国版)的制订及信效度检验 被引量:3

Reliability and Validity of Driving Behavior Scale (Chinese) in Chinese Drivers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验中文版驾驶行为量表(Driving Behavior Scale,DBS)在国内驾驶员群体中的信度、效度和适用性。方法采用中文版驾驶行为量表对360名驾驶员进行了测量,获得328份有效问卷,通过项目分析和因素分析,形成最终中文版量表。结果量表共有21个题目,分为3个维度:过度的安全/谨慎行为、驾驶功能缺陷和敌意/攻击行为。累计方差解释率为62.48%。量表的内部一致性系数为0.86,各个因素的内部一致性系数在0.81-0.93之间,P均<0.001。修订后中文版驾驶行为量表各维度与驾驶安全态度量表各维度之间显著相关。这说明该量表的相容效度良好。结论最终中文版驾驶行为量表信效度良好,能够可靠而有效的测量国内焦虑驾驶行为。 ObjectiveTo test the reliability, validity and applicability of the Driving Behavior Scale (DBS) in Chinese drivers. Methods A total of 328 valid questionnaires were obtained from 360 drivers using the Chinese Drivers' Behavior Scale (DBS). The final scale was established through item test, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results The scale consisted of 21 subjects, divided into 3 dimensions: excessively driving safety, driving function defect and aggressive driving. The cumulative variance explained rate was 62.48%. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and the internal consistency coefficient of each factor is between 0.81 and 0.93, p 〈0.001. The dimensions of the revised scale were significantly correlated with driving safety attitude scale, indicating that the scales had good compatibility validity. ConclusionThe Chinese version of the driving behavior scale (DBS) has good reliability and validity, which is a reliable and effective tool for measuring anxiety driving behavior in China.
出处 《人类工效学》 2017年第5期9-13,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
关键词 驾驶行为 过度的安全/谨慎行为 驾驶功能缺陷 敌意/攻击行为 焦虑 交通心理 交通安全 driving behavior excessively driving safety driving function defect aggressive driving;anxiety traffic psychology traffic safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1杨京帅.预防道路交通事故的驾驶行为干预技术分析[J].人类工效学,2005,11(3):38-40. 被引量:9
  • 2Elander J, West R, French D. Behavioral Correlates of Individual Differences in Road Traffic Crash Risk: An Examination of Methods and Findings[J]. Psycho- logical Bulletin, 1993, 113(2):279.
  • 3Farah H, Bekhor S, Polus A, et al. A Passing Gap Acceptance Model for Two- lane Rural Highways[ J ]. Transportmetrica, 2009, 5 (3) : 159 - 172.
  • 4Constantinescu Z, Marinoiu C, Vladoiu M. Driving Style Analysis Using Data Mining Techniques [ J ]. In- ternational Journal Of Computers Communications and Control, 2010, 5(5): 654-663.
  • 5Taubman - Ben - Ari O, Mikulincer M, Gillath O. The Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory Scale Construct and Validation [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004, 36(3): 323- 332.
  • 6Taubman -Ben -Ari O. Couple Similarity for Driving style [ J ]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2006, 9(3): 185 -193.
  • 7Holland C, Geraghty J, Shah K. Differential Modera- ting Effect of Locus of Control on Effect of Driving Ex- perience in Young Male and Female Drivers [ J]. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 2010, 48 (7) : 821 - 826.
  • 8Poo FM, Taubman- Ben- Ari O, Ledesma RD, et al. Reliability and Validity of A Spanish - language Version of the Muhidimensional Driving Style Invento- ry[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psy- chology and Behaviour, 2013, 17 (2) : 75 - 87.
  • 9Parker D,Manstead A S,Stradling S G,et al.Determinants of in- tention to commit driving violations[J].Accident Analysis Pre= vention,1992,24(2) : 117-131.
  • 10Iversen H.Risk--taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behav- iour,2004,7(3) 135-150.

共引文献29

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部