清代“理学别派”与善书运动——以罗有高《书济阳张子〈立命说辩〉后》为中心

Special Neo-Confucianism Factions and Morality Book Movement in Qing Dynasty:Centering on Luo Yougao's Comment on limingshuobian by Zhangzi

明清善书的发展与宋明理学的演进相表里,有关善书的争论在明清理学家之间不断展开,其中清中叶罗有高《书济阳张子〈立命说辩〉后》就是重要作品。罗有高以清初张尔岐为对话对象,又回应到晚明袁黄的《立命篇》中。由于"理学别派""理学而兼通释典"的思想特质,罗有高在人性观上坚持"性有三品",在天道观上坚持"理势自然"和"纪功录过"双重属性,有效调和了善书与儒学之间的紧张,为善书的发展奠定了社会基础和终极依据,推动了晚明以来"善书运动"的发展。以此为中心梳理从袁黄到张尔岐和罗有高之间的文本脉络和思想脉络,殊为理解明清理学变迁和士大夫文化的重要途径。

The Morality Books and Neo-Confucianism had close relationship in Ming and Qing Dynasties. And there were so many debates happened between Neo-Confucians. Luo Yougao＇s Comment on limingshuobian（argument on destiny） by Zhangzi was an important one. Largely differing from Zhang Erqi who was a Neo-Confucian in early Qing Dynasty, Luo Yougao responsed to Yuan Huang＇s Limingpian in Late Ming Dynasty. As a special Neo-Confucian, Luo Yougao was proficient both in Neo-Confucian and Buddhism, which made Luo Yougao insist on that the humanity had three levels, when insisted on that the Tian had dual properties.By doing this, Luo Yougao effectively reconciled the relationship between Morality Books and Confucian classics, and of course promoted the development of Morality Book Movement in Qing Dynasty. Based on these, we may have a new understanding of Morality Books, Neo-Confucianism and Literati culture in Ming and Qing Dynasties.