期刊文献+

多维健康评估量表在类风湿关节炎患者中的临床应用价值 被引量:7

Clinical value of multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估中文版多维健康评估量表(MDHAQ-C)在中国RA病情评估中的临床价值。方法2015年12月至2016年10月现场调查RA患者共412例,独立完成MDHAQ-C,计算患者数据指标常规评估值3(RAPID3),通过Spearman相关分析比较RAPID3和疾病临床指标及疾病活动指数DAS28-ESR、临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)、简化的疾病活动指数(SDAI)的相关性。结果RAPID3和ESR(r=0.399)、CRP(r=0.381)、肿胀关节数(SJC)(r=0.499)、压痛关节数(TJC)(r=0.558)中度相关(P〈0.01);和疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)(r=0.836)、患者病情自我评估VAS评分(r=0.915)及医生病情VAS评分(r=0.780)强相关(P〈0.001);和疾病活动指数DAS28-ESR(r=0.784)、CDAI(r=0.734)、SDAI(r=0.682)强相关(P〈0.01)。结论MDHAQ-C用于RA疾病活动评估临床价值高,且操作简便,适用于临床工作。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of Chinese Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ-C) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsFrom December 2015 to October 2016, four hundred and twelve RA patients were recruited in this study and completed the MDHAQ-C independently and routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3) was calculated. Then correlations were assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient of RAPID3 with indices of clinical relevance and disease activity to evaluate its clinical values.ResultsMDHAQ-C is moderately correlated with ESR (r=0.399), CRP (r=0.381), SJC (r=0.499), TJC (r=0.558) (P〈0.01), but highly correlation with VAS of pain (r=0.836), VAS of global status (r=0.915) and overall assessment of physician (r=0.784)(P〈0.01), and highly correlated with a Spearman's coefficient of 0.784 for DAS 28-ESR, 0.734 for CDAI and 0.682 for SDAI(P〈0.001).ConclusionMDHAQ is a reliable, valid instrument for disease activity assessment and a feasible index for clinical settings in Chinese RA patients.
出处 《中华风湿病学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期652-656,共5页 Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81373117,81429003,31530020)
关键词 关节炎 类风湿 中文版多维健康评估量表 临床价值 Arthritis, rheumatoid Chinese multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire Clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Burckhardt CS, Archenhohz B, Bjelle A. Measuring the quality of life of women with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus: a Swedish version of the quality of life scale (QOLS)[J]. Seand J Rheumatol, 1992, 21(4): 190-195.
  • 2Milligan SE, Horn DL, Ballou SP, et al. An assessment of the health assessment questionnaire functional ability index among women with systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. J Rheumatol,1993, 20(6): 972-976.
  • 3Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Ong A, et al. A comparison of five health status instruments in patients with systemic lupus erythe- matosus (SLE)[J]. Lupus, 1996, 5(3): 190-195.
  • 4Fortin PR, Abrahamowicz M, Neville C, et al. Impact of disease activity and cumulative damage on the health of lupus patients[J]. Lupus, 1998, 7(2): 101-107.
  • 5Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Ong A, et al. Lack of correlation among the 3 outcomes describing SLE: disease activity, damage and quality of life[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 1996, 14(3): 305- 308.
  • 6Pineus T, Sokka T. Can a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) scores be informative in patients with all rheumat- ic diseases? [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 2007, 21 (4): 733-753.
  • 7Pincus T, Askanase AD, Swearingen CJ. A multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and routine assess- ment of patient index data (RAPID 3) scores are informative in patients with all rheumatic diseases[J]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2009, 35(4): 819-827.
  • 8Askanase AD, Castrejon I, Pincus T. Quantitative data for care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in usual cfinical settings: a patient multidimensional health assessment question- naire and physician estimate of noninflammatory symptoms[J]. J Rheumatol, 2011, 38(7): 1309-1316.
  • 9Pincus T, Sokka T, Kautiainen I-I. Further development of a physical function scale on a mdhaq [corrected] for standard care of patients with rheumatic diseases[J]. J Rheumatol, 2005, 32 (8): 1432-1439.
  • 10Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46(12): 1417- 1432.

同被引文献89

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部