期刊文献+

经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后病理分期升级预测因素分析 被引量:1

Predictors of pathological upstaging after transurethral resection of bladder tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术术前临床分期评估的准确性及预测术后病理分期变化预测因素。方法:收集2010年1月~2014年1月我院258例行经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术患者的临床病例资料,包括患者年龄、性别、肾积水情况、尿脱落细胞学、双合诊结果、既往膀胱癌病史、术前临床分期和术后病理分期等。比较术前临床分期与术后病理分期差别,Logistic回归分析膀胱癌术后病理分期升级与降级的影响因素。结果:术前临床分期与术后病理学分期一致的共224例(86.8%),34例(13.2%)存在差异(29例出现术后病理分期升级,5例出现术后病理分期降级)。多因素Logistic回归分析提示双合诊中触及明显肿块的是术后病理分期上调的预测因子(95%CI:2.25~58.21,OR=11.43,P<0.01)。结论:膀胱癌术前临床分期与术后病理分期准确性高,术前双合诊是术后病理分期升级的独立预测因素。 Objective:To determine the accuracy of clinical stage after transurethral resection of bladder tumor and to identify factors predicting the discrepancy between clinical stage and pathological stage.Method:We retrospectively reviewed 258 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor from January 2010 to January 2014.Clinicopathological characteristics were collected to compare the difference between clinical stage and pathological stage.Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of pathological upstaging.Result:The concordance rate was 86.8%(224/258)between clinical stage and pathological stage.Stage was upgraded in 29 patients and was downgraded in 5 patients.Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the presence of a palpable mass in the bimanual examination was a predictor of pathological upstaging(P〈0.01,OR=11.43,95%CI:2.25-58.21).Conclusion:This study demonstrated the high accuracy between clinical and pathological stage.A palpable mass in the bimanual examination was an independent predictor of pathological upstaging.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2017年第10期764-766,770,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 膀胱癌 经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术 临床分期 病理分期 bladder cancer transurethral resection of bladder tumor clinical stage pathological stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨德安,李慎勤,王洪伟,李香铁,刘少鸽,韩玮.TURBt和膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较和选择[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1993,8(1):27-28. 被引量:32
  • 2宗绍云,陶志鹏,马超龙,郝丽娜,普苹,冯毓正.膀胱癌组织形态定量分析和病理学研究(附20例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(12):727-728. 被引量:3
  • 3温机灵,周祥福,高新,黄文涛,张涛,蔡育彬,邱剑光,苏祖兰.膀胱癌术前活检分级低估现象分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(12):833-835. 被引量:17
  • 4Paik M L, Scolieri M J, Brown S L, etal. Limitations of computerized tomography in s,aging invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy[J]. J Urol, 2000, 163:1693--1696.
  • 5Frodin L, Hemmingsson A, Johansson A, et al. Corn puted tomography in staging of bladder carcinoma[J]. Acta Radiol Diagn, 1980, 21:763--765.
  • 6Jeong K K, Park S Y, Han J A, el al. Bladder cancer: analysis of muti detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging[J].Radiology, 2004, 231: 725--731.
  • 7Dirk B, ZhangJ B, Schoder H, etal. Bladder cancer can imaging change patient management[J]? Cur Opin Urol, 2008,18: 98-104.
  • 8Zhang J, Gerst S, Lefkowitz R A, et al. Imaging of bladder cancer[J].Radiol Clin North Am, 2007, 45:183- 205.
  • 9Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo- therapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349: 859- 866.
  • 10Griffiths G, Hall R, Sylvester R, et al. International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblas- tine ehemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial [J]. J Clin Ocol, 2011, 29: 2171-2177.

共引文献77

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部