重庆玉米洞遗址石灰岩石器的埋藏实验

Taphonomic experiments on the limestone lithics from the Yumidong site in Chongqing

埋藏实验是伴随曙石器之争而形成的一种辨别石制品真伪的重要途径。玉米洞遗址是重庆巫山县近年来新发现的以石灰岩石器著称的旧石器时代洞穴遗址,该遗址出土的石灰岩石器因其原料劣质、埋藏环境复杂、加工程度浅而在人工性质的认定上存在一些争议。本文根据玉米洞遗址的地层堆积成因而设计了踩踏实验和滚动实验两种形式,对石灰岩石器进行模拟实验,观察实验标本在人与动物踩踏和滚动作用下发生改变的情况和规律,进而对比出土石制品面貌,为石制品人工属性的认定提供依据和参考,重新审视石灰岩石器。

Taphonomic experiments regarding the eolith controversy are one important approach in distinguishing the authenticity of stone tools. The newly-discovered Yumidong Paleolithic cave site is located in Wushan County, Chongqing. The site is famous for its limestone lithics. Due to inferior raw materials, a complicated taphonomic history and the lack of further research, the man-made nature of limestone lithics from the site is disputed. In this paper, the author designed a trampling experiment and a rolling experiment to simulate the features seen on the limestone lithics and to observe the acquired damage related to the history of stratigraphic deposition in the Yumidong site. Furthermore, the author also compared excavated specimens with the experimental lithics to provide a reference collection for better affirming the artificial property of limestone lithics.Trampling experiments produce scars closely associated with the texture and shape of the ground surface, relating directly to the compactness and stability of the sediment. These features are less influenced by the raw materials, trampling force, softness or hardness of hooves and other such factors. Rolling experiments showed that the type and velocity of movement was crucially related to the specimen scars that formed. The experimental results demonstrated more micro- scars caused by friction, and fewer small to mid-length scars caused by collision. There are also a number of differences in the scars distribution, shape, size, and depth between the experimental specimens and the excavated lithics.Pseudo-tools may be formed by mixed acting forces but not ＇by a single type of force. The identification of tools becomes uncertain under the condition of mixed forces. In such cases, the comparative experimental collection is useful. In conclusion, we should treat limestone lithics prudently, neither simply denying them as genuine artefacts nor easily affirming them by subjective conjecture.