“学术规范化”语境下法学研究范式的反思

Reflection and criticism of "knowledge production" and "academic standardization"

中国的知识生产正由粗放的量的增长向着重于自主创新的质的提升转变。然而,大规模"知识生产"愈演愈烈的背景下,知识检验与鉴别成为具有高难度的挑战性工作,伪劣知识泛滥于市场,增量强势的情况不断,凡此种种,亟需进行"学术规范化"的再讨论。当下人文社科的学术研究实质上是一种"自上而下"的知识规划体制安排,法学学科也出现了愈发强调"知识生产"的趋向。在学术研究空前繁荣的同时,应对既有的"集体性"知识生产体制作批判性反思,重新思索学术本土化的契合路径。就法学研究而言,更应强调人文科学与社会科学交融的研究方法,坚持"法之理在法外"的开阔视野,对现有的方法论进行重新审视和反思。

China＇s knowledge production is changing from quantity growth to upgrading of quality that focuses on independent innovation. However, under the background of large-scale ＂knowledge production＂ becoming increasingly fierce, knowledge testing and identification has become a challenging task with high difficulty, fake and inferior knowledge is rampant in the market, and the growth of quantity is constant, all of these need a further discussion of ＂academic standardization＂. At present, the academic research of Humanities and social sciences is essentially a ＂top-down＂ knowledge planning system, and the discipline of law has increasingly emphasized the trend of ＂knowledge production＂. While the academic research is flourishing at the same time, we should make a critical reflection on the existing ＂collective＂ knowledge producing bodies and reconsider the adaptation path of academic localization. As far as legal research is concerned, we should emphasize the research methods of blending humanities and Social Sciences, and persist in the open field of view of ＂the theory of law outside the law＂, and re -examine and rethink the existing methodology.