经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术与前列腺电切术近期疗效的对比分析

Comparison on transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and the curative effect of transurethral resection of prostate

目的:探讨经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术和前列腺电切术的疗效。方法:收治前列腺增生患者130例,随机分为研究组和对照组,各65例。研究组使用经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术进行治疗,对照组使用前列腺电切术进行治疗。结果:研究组患者并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后出血量、留置尿管时间和平均住院时间均明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术和前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生的近期效果均较好,但是经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术的中远期治疗效果较好,术后出血量较少,留置尿管的时间较少。

Objective：To investigate the curative effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate.Methods：130 cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly divided into the study group and the control group,with 65 cases in each group.Patients in the study group received transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate treatment;the control group were treated with transurethral resection of prostate.Results：The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group（P〈0.05）.The postoperative bleeding volume,indwelling catheter time and average hospital stay in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Both the transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of prostate has good curative effect on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia,but the long-term curative effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is better,with less postoperative bleeding,and less time of indwelling catheter.