期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术的对照研究 被引量:1

Comparative study of laparoscopic and open radical resection of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术的效果。方法:收治直肠癌患者72例,平分两组。对照组采取开腹直肠癌根治术,观察组采取腹腔镜直肠癌根治术,对两组术中与术后情况进行比较。结果:在手术时间方面,对照组明显短于观察组;在手术过程中的出血量及并发症,观察组明显少于对照组;进食时间与住院时间观察组明显短于对照组。上述研究结果的组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用腹腔镜治疗直肠癌相比于开腹治疗直肠癌具有显著效果。 Objective:To compare the effect of laparoscopic and open radical resection of rectal cancer.Methods:72 patients with rectal cancer were selected.They were randomly divided into the two groups on average.The patients in the control group underwent open radical resection of rectal cancer,while laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer was performed in the observation group.The intraoperative and postoperative conditions of the two groups were observed and compared.Results:In operation time,the patients in the control group were significantly shorter than those in the observation group.In the operation process of bleeding volume and complications,the observation group patients were less than the control group.The patients in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group in terms of eating time and length of stay.The above results were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer has a significant effect compared with laparotomy for rectal cancer.
作者 唐德国
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第33期29-30,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术 开腹直肠癌根治术 病例对照 Laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer Open radical resection of rectal cancer Case control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1马冬岩,梁健.腹腔镜经腹膜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补手术方式的体会(附23例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(4):391-392. 被引量:8
  • 2Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF,et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer:a prospective randomized trial[ J]. Ann Surg 0ncol,2008,15 (9) :2418-2425.
  • 3Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer:a prospective compara- tive study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19 ( 11 ) : 1460-1467.
  • 4Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopie vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 ( 8 ) : 1211-1215.
  • 5Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer:a Scandinavian consensus [ J ]. Br J Surg, 1995,82 ( 10 ) : 1297-1299.
  • 6Spiliotis J, Zoras O. Extraperitoneal rectal cancer : why laparoscopie may be more ettective than open surgery[J]. 5urg Endosc, 2011,25 (2) :658-660.
  • 7Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H, et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesoreetal exci- sion for rectal cancer [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2009,23 ( 2 ) : 296-303.
  • 8Rullier E,Sa Cunha A,Couderc P,et al.Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer.Br J Surg,2003,90:445-451.
  • 9Morino M,Parini U,Giraudo G,et al.Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision:a consecutive series of 100 patients.Ann Surg,2003,237:335-342.
  • 10Heald RJ,Moran B J,Ryall RD,et al.Rectal cancer:the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision,1978-1997.Arch Surg,1998,133:894-899.

共引文献82

同被引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部