Google H5指数与CiteScore指数的期刊定量评价方法对比分析——基于知识扩散的视角

Comparative Analysis of Quantitative Journal Evaluation Methods:Google H5,CiteScore Index——Based on the Perspective of Knowledge Diffusion

[目的/意义]以经济管理领域为例,将期刊定量评价的指标Google H5指数、Cite Score指数进行比较,能够为研究者和科研机构遴选期刊提供充分的建议。[方法/过程]从文献双角色的视角,将基于引文的知识扩散分解成期刊引用的知识输入阶段和期刊被引用的知识输出阶段,并阐述了期刊知识扩散广度和知识扩散强度的计算方法和计量公式。[结果/结论]研究发现Cit Score期刊无论在知识输入或是知识输出阶段,扩散广度和扩散强度都高于Google H5期刊,且两组指标的数据具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。

[ Purpose/Significance] This study provides a systematic comparison between quantitative journal evaluation of Google H5 in-dex and CitScore index in economic and management field, and the results offer sufficient suggestions for researchers and institutions to se-lect journals. [ Method/Process] This paper expounds indicators and formulas of journal knowledge diffusion which include breadth, inten- sity to measure the influence of journals, and knowledge diffusion process which is divided into two stages that are knowledge importation and knowledge exportation from the perspective of citation analysis based on dual roles. [ Result^Conclusion] There is significant compara-bility in knowledge diffusion between the two groups in the two phases （ P 〈0. 05） and results demonstrate that, whether in knowledge in-put or knowledge output phase, CitScore journals 爷 diffusion range and diffusion intensity are higher than those of Google H5 journals,based on the theory and method of knowledge diffusion.