摘要
现行《刑法》只有一些分则条文对牵连犯规定了不同的定罪处罚规则,而总则条文没有一般性规定,这导致了对于牵连犯定罪处罚规则的混乱、矛盾局面。牵连犯定罪处罚规则的选取,由多种因素共同决定:牵连犯本质及其构成条件、犯罪的本质和刑罚观、国家对具体犯罪的刑事政策、数罪并罚制度等。若欲弭除抵牾,使立法对牵连犯定罪处罚规则规范化和科学化,宜在刑法总则规定:"对于牵连犯,从一重罪从重处罚。法律规定数罪并罚的,依照规定。"刑法分则规范在对特定的牵连犯作出数罪并罚规定时,要基于审慎的严惩政策;具体的司法解释也尽量避免把所涉及的牵连犯解释为实行数罪并罚。此外,作为配套措施还应修改我国的数罪并罚制度来促进牵连犯处断规则的和谐。
Criminal law does not provide for the criminal conviction and punishment rules,but some sub-provisions of criminal law provide the implicated criminals of the different conviction and punishment rules.From the macroscopic point of view,there are a number of factors that determine the choice of the conviction and punishment rules of the implicated offender:the criminal law should be the general provisions of the criminal code:the implicated offender should be punished severely from a felony.In the criminal law on the specific crime implicated in punishment,we should carefully select the policy stance to the severe punish.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2017年第6期25-33,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2015年教育部人文社会科学研究项目"犯罪本质的法益说修正及其实证研究"(项目编号:15YJA820020)
"北京市中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心项目和北京市社会科学基金项目(项目编号:16FXAL003)"的部分研究成果
关键词
牵连犯
犯罪本质和刑罚观
数罪并罚
从一重罪从重处罚
implicated crime
the nature of crime and penalty view
combined punishment for several crimes
accordance with the felony for heavier punishment