以法律效果为视角析无权处分合同的效力——兼议《买卖合同司法解释》第三条

Analyze the Legal Validity about Unauthorized Disposition——Discussion on the Article 3 of Judiciary Interpretation about Sales Contract

无权处分行为常谈常新,无权处分合同的效力自《合同法》第五十一条规定后备受争议,最高人民法院《关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》第三条的规定再次引发广泛讨论。在法律效果上不仅使民事审判发生分歧,而且也引起刑事司法适用的争论。鉴于目前我国信用体系尚未建立,无权处分合同效力原则上应坚持无效,特殊情况下构成犯罪;若涉及善意第三人,可例外肯定无权处分行为的效力。

People have been arguing the regulation about unauthorized disposition in Article 51 of Contract Law for a long time,from the judiciary interpretation about sales contract was issued by The Supreme People’s Court of China in 2012,the rule about unauthorized disposition in article 3.aroused hot discussion among scholars again.Courts in different regions and different levels always make different civil decisions.In the mean time,people are arguing that if the deed of unauthorized disposition can still be regarded as criminaloffense when we admit it’s validity？ Because honesty system has not been found in China,Unauthorized disposition should be regarded as void act generally,in specific cases it should be deemed as crime,except to protect bona fides third parties.