摘要
传统权利二分论理及其指导下的司法实务使那些备受私主体侵害的基本权利无法纳入到私法保护体系。侵权法调整范围的开放性、调整手段的多样性,都使这些包括宪法权利在内的公权利救济提供了极大的可能性,在客观上也为基本权利的救济提供了可选性与可行性。在宪法司法化不能实现的背景下,基本权利保护不力局面若想得扭转,必须另辟蹊径——纳入到侵权法调整范围,而侵权法本身又可通过"一般人格权"路径和公序良俗路径涵涉到宪法权利。
The division of public and private law leads to the division of public and private rights.Under the traditional theory,public rights are protected by public law and the private rights are protected by private law.The problem is that even though some rights prescribed in the constitutional law,because of the limitations of law itself,or because of the lack of rights relief,when those rights are violated by natural person and can not get effective protection,it will not be in accordance with the provisions of the international convention on human rights.Can we protect these public rights prescribed in Constitutional law or other pubic laws by tort law?And what are the concrete paths? All these issues above have become the research emphasis in this paper.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2017年第6期119-127,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2012年度广西高等学校重点资助科研项目"侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:201202ZD083)
关键词
公法
私法
公权利
私权利
侵权范围
public law
private law
public rights
private rights
tort law