期刊文献+

法庭不礼貌话语的分类研究 被引量:1

A Study of the Classification of Impolite Utterances in the Courtroom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从强性与弱性、直接与间接、积极与消极三个维度探讨法庭不礼貌话语分类发现:法庭强性不礼貌话语包括挑战、诋毁、侮辱、负面断言,而弱性不礼貌话语主要表现为沉默;法庭直接不礼貌话语包括打断、否认、指责、挑战、负面断言,而间接不礼貌话语主要有反问和讽刺;法庭积极不礼貌现象主要有沉默、否认、侮辱、负面断言,而消极不礼貌话语有打断、提醒、指示。 This paper explores the classification of impolite utterances in the courtroom from the dimensions of strong and weak impoliteness,direct and indirect impoliteness and positive and negative impoliteness.Strong impolite utterances in the courtroom include challenging,slander,insult and asserting negatively,while weak impolite utterances in the courtroom mainly includes silence.Direct impolite utterances in the courtroom include interrupting,denying,criticizing,challenging and asserting negatively,while indirect impolite utterances in the courtroom include rhetorical questions and sarcasm.Positive impolite utterances in the courtroom include silence,denying,insult and asserting negatively,while negative impolite utterances in the courtroom include interrupting,reminding and indicating.
作者 高洁英
出处 《五邑大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第4期85-89,共5页 Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 广东省江门市哲学社会科学项目"法庭冲突性话语不和谐取向的语用研究"(批准号:JM2016C44)之阶段性研究成果
关键词 法庭不礼貌话语 不礼貌话语分类 强性不礼貌 直接不礼貌 积极不礼貌 impolite utterances in the courtroom classification of impolite utterances strong impolite utterances direct impolite utterances positive impolite utterance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1王建华.礼貌的相对性[J].外国语,1998,21(3):19-23. 被引量:152
  • 2顾曰国.礼貌、语用与文化[J].外语教学与研究,1992,24(4):10-17. 被引量:1148
  • 3柯贤兵.法庭调解话语中称谓语礼貌现象语用研究[A].《语用学研究》第4辑,北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
  • 4廖美珍.中国法庭话语(不)礼貌现象研究[A].《语用学研究》第4辑,北京:高等教育出版社,2012.
  • 5Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson, 1987. Polite- ness: Some Universals in Language Usage[ M ]. Cam- bridge; Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Conley, J. & OBarr, W. Just Words: Law, Language and Power [ M ]. The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
  • 7Delgado, Duma, Brown, Lee, & Hubbert. Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Altema- five Dispute Resolution [ J ] . Wisconsin Law Review, 1985.
  • 8Edwards D ( 2006 ) Facts, Norms and Dispositions : Practical Uses of the Modal Verb Would in Police In- terrogations [ J ]. Discourse Studies 8 (4) :475 - 501.
  • 9Faircough, N. Language and Power [ M ]. London: Longman Group UK Limited, 1989.
  • 10Ford CA. Denial and The Construction of Conversa- tional Turns [ A ]. In: Bybee J and Noonan M (eds) Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse [ C ]. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2002, pp. 61 - 78.

共引文献25

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部