介绍贿赂罪的立法反思及司法认定

On Legislative Reflection And Judicial Confirmation of Crime of Introducing Bribery

介绍贿赂罪因其和贿赂犯罪的共犯难以区分,带来定罪上的困惑和处刑上的不协调,因此,学界对介绍贿赂罪是否应该废除以及其和贿赂犯罪的共犯如何区分见仁见智。应保留介绍贿赂罪,体现其独有的立法价值,再把介绍贿赂罪的行为界定为只为行贿人或受贿人引荐出贿赂的相对方,并安排双方沟通、见面的行为,不包括行贿、受贿的教唆行为和随后对贿赂行为的策划和参与行为。这样能合理地把介绍贿赂罪和贿赂犯罪的共犯区分开来。对于该罪的罪状,不同意把介绍贿赂罪的犯罪主体扩大至单位,把犯罪对象扩大至非国家工作人员和单位的观点;关于司法认定,可以增加一款提示性规定:成立本罪,同时构成其他犯罪的,依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚;并对其情节严重的认定标准进行修改。

Being hard to distinguish crime of introducing bribery from accomplice of bribery crime and crime of offering bribes,there exists confusion of conviction and disharmony of punishment in crime of introducing bribery,which leads to argument of reserving or abolishing crime of introducing bribery and how it differs from accomplice of bribery crime.Crime of introducing bribery should be defined as acts of introducing bribers and bribery recipients,then arranging to communicate and meet with each other,excluding acts of instigating bribers and bribery recipients and planning and implementing bribery.In this way,it's easier to distinguish crime of introducing bribery from accomplice of bribery crime and crime of offering bribes,and crime of introducing bribery can embody its legislative values.The subject of this crime should not be extended to including units,and its object should not be extended to including non-national officials and units.Its assertion of quantity of crimes and conviction standard of serious circumstances should be properly defined by modifying judicial interpretations.