期刊文献+

自由贸易协定能有效缓解金融危机吗?——基于倾向得分匹配模型的实证检验 被引量:6

Can Free Trade Agreement Effectively Ease the Financial Crisis?——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Propensity Score Matching Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用中国与212个国家(地区)的双边贸易数据,在经典截面引力模型基础上,基于拟自然实验思想,运用匹配模型探讨自由贸易协定签订对于2008年世界金融危机前后中国双边贸易的促进作用。研究表明:传统模型对自贸协定贸易效应存在高估的问题。此外,在全球经济形势较好的年份,自由贸易协定的促进效应较小,随着世界金融危机的爆发,自贸协定的贸易促进效果显著增强。因此,在当前经济形势下,中国应当加快自由贸易协定的谈判进程,以积极应对各国不断抬头的贸易保护主义,保证我国出口贸易的平稳增长。 Stating from the gravity model and the principles of quasi natural experiment, this paper discusses the promoting effect of free trade agreements on China' s bilateral trade before and after the global financial crisis in 2008, using matching model and data of bilateral trade between China and 212 countries and regions. The results show that the gravity model overestimates the trade effects of the FTA. In addition, the promoting effect of the FTA is inconsiderable when the world market enjoys a good economic situation. However, the effect is obviously strengthened when the financial crisis breaks out. In the current economic situation, China should quicken its pace in negotiating more free trade agreements so as to ensure the steady growth of China' s export against the rise of trade protectionism in other countries.
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期63-68,共6页 Economic Survey
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD158) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJC790027) 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2016GM15)
关键词 自由贸易协定 贸易效应 核密度分析 倾向得分匹配 Free Trade Agreement Trade Effect Kernel Density Analysis Propensity Score Matching
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献50

  • 1李春顶,赵美英.出口贸易是否提高了我国企业的生产率?——基于中国2007年制造业企业数据的检验[J].财经研究,2010,36(4):14-24. 被引量:66
  • 2唐清泉,罗党论.政府补贴动机及其效果的实证研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].金融研究,2007(06A):149-163. 被引量:394
  • 3克鲁格曼 奥伯斯法尔德.《国际经济学》[M].中国人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 4Abadie, A. "Semiparametric Difference-in- differences Estimators. " Review of Economics Studies, 2005, 72, pp. 1-19.
  • 5Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. "On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators. " Mimeo, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2005.
  • 6Bernard, A. and Jensen, J. "Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing: 1976-1987. " Microeconomics, 1999, pp. 67-112.
  • 7Bernard, A. and Jensen, J. "Why Finns Export?" Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, pp. 561-569.
  • 8Bernard, A. ; Eaton J. ; Jensen,J. and Kortum, S. "Plants and Productivity in International Trade. " American Economic Review, 2003, 93, pp. 1268-1290.
  • 9Bernard, A. ; Redding, S. and Schott, P. "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms. " Review of Ecortomic Studies, 2007, 74, pp. 31-66.
  • 10Das, S. ; Roberts,M. J. and Tybout, J. R. "Market Entry Costs, Producer Heterogeneity, and Export dynamies. " Econometrica, 2007, 75, pp. 837-873.

共引文献97

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部