期刊文献+

右美托咪定对Wilson病继发脾功能亢进患者全身麻醉下脾切除术后躁动的影响 被引量:2

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Agitation of Wilson's Disease Patients with Secondary Hypersplenism after General Anesthesia of Splonectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察右美托咪定对Wilson病继发脾功能亢进患者全身麻醉下脾切除术后躁动的影响。方法:选取某院2016年1-12月的全身麻醉下行脾切除术Wilson病继发脾功能亢进患者60例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各30例。观察组患者麻醉诱导前15 min静脉恒速泵注右美托咪定0.4μg/kg,之后为0.4μg/(kg·h)维持至脾切除后;对照组患者给予等量的生理盐水,其余麻醉方案两组相同。观察两组患者开始泵注前(T_0)、插管前(T_1)、插管后1 min(T_2)、拔管前(T_3)及拔管后3 min(T_4)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(SpO_2),记录两组患者T_3和T_4时间点Riker镇静-躁动评分(SAS),比较两组患者麻醉后监测治疗室(PACU)停留时间及心动过缓发生情况。结果:T_0时,两组患者MAP、HR、SpO_2水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T1、T_2、T_3、T_4时,两组患者MAP、HR水平均显著降低,且观察组显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);但SpO_2所有时间点均为100%,组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者T_3、T_4时Riker SAS评分均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者心动过缓发生率为26.67%,显著高于对照组的3.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但静脉注射阿托品后均得以纠正。观察组PACU停留时间显著短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:右美托咪定能稳定Wilson病继发脾功能亢进患者术后血流动力学,降低躁动情况,并缩短PACU转出时间。 OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on postoperative agitation of Wilson' s disease patients with secondary hypersplenism after genernl anesthesia of splenectomy. METHODS: A total of 60 Wilson' s disease patients with secondary hypersplenism underwent general anesthesia of splenectomy duning Jan.-Dec. 2016 were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table, with 30 cases in each group. Observation group was given intravenous pump of Dex 0.4 -tg/kg at constant speed 15 min before anesthesia induction, and then maintained at 0.4 pg/(kg.h)till splenectomy completed. Control group was given constant volume of normal saline. Other anesthesia plans were same in 2 groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 2 groups were observed before pumping (To), before in- tubation (T-), 1 rain after intubation (T2), before extubation (T3), 3 rain after extubation (T4). Riker sedation-agitation score (SAS) were recorded in 2 groups at T3 and T4. The duration of stay in postanesthesia intensive care unit (PACU) and the occur- rence of bradycardia were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: At To, there was no statistical significance in MAP, HR or SpO2 levels between 2 groups (P〉0.05). At T-, T2, T3 and T4, MAP and HR levels of 2 groups were decreased significantly, and the observation group was significantly lower than the control group, with statistical significance (P〈0.05). SpO2 were 100% at each time point, there was no statistical significance between 2 groups (P〉0.05). Riker SAS scores of observation group was sig- nificantly lower than that of control group, with statistical significance (P〈0.05). The incidence of bradycardia in observation group was 26.67 %, which was significantly higher than 3.33 % of control group, with statistical significance (P〈0.05). But this symptom was corrected after intravenous injection of atropine. The duration of stay in PACU in observation group was significant- ly shorter than control group, with statistical significance (P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dex can keep postoperative hemodynam- ics stable in Wilson's disease patients with secondary hypersplenism, reduce agitation and shorten the time of the patients transferring from PACU.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第32期4513-4516,共4页 China Pharmacy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81471145)
关键词 右美托咪定 术后躁动 WILSON病 脾切除 全身麻醉 Dexmedetomidine Postoperative agitation Wilson' s disease Splenectomy General anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献53

  • 1丁玲玲,张宏,米卫东,何艳,张旭,马鑫,李宏召.右美托咪啶对老年患者在机器人辅助腹腔镜手术麻醉苏醒期及术后认知功能的影响[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(2):129-135. 被引量:64
  • 2邓小明,曾因明.米勒麻醉学[M].7版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:2088-2089.
  • 3Mantz J, Josserand J, Hamada S. Dexmedetomidine : new insights [ J. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2011,28 ( 1 ) :3 - 6.
  • 4Afonso J, Reis F. Dexmedetomidine: current role in anesthesiaand intensive care [ J ]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2012,62 ( 1 ) : 118 - 33.
  • 5Dere K, Sucullu I, Budak E T, et al. A comparison of dexme- detomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation [ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010,27 (7) :648 - 52.
  • 6Wei S, Tian J, Song X, et al. Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer [ J ]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008,86 ( 1 ) :266 - 72.
  • 7Lawrence C J, Prinzen F W, de Lange S. The effect of dexmedeto- midine on nutrient organ blood flow J ]. Anesth Analg, 1996,83 (6) :1160 -5.
  • 8Tsai C J, Chu K S, Chen T I, et al. A comparison of the effec- tiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol target-controlled infu- sion for sedation during fibreoptie nasotracheal intubation[ J]. An- aesthesia, 2010,65 ( 3 ) :254 - 9.
  • 9Aksu R, Kumandas S, Akin A, et al. The comparison of the effects of dcxmedetomidine and midazolam sedation on eleetroen- cephalography in pediatric patients with febrile convulsion [ J . Paediatr Anaesth, 2011,21 (4) :373 - 8.
  • 10Gillespie R, Shishani Y, Streit J, et al. The safety of controlled hypotension for shoulder arthroscopy in the beach-chair position [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(14) : 1284 -90.

共引文献153

同被引文献15

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部