摘要
目的:探讨经肱三头肌舌形瓣入路,锁定联合非锁定双重建钛板垂直固定与Y形及双重建钢板平行固定在治疗肱骨髁C型骨折中临床疗效。方法:分别用锁定联合非锁定双重建板垂直、Y形钢板及双重建板平行固定治疗肱骨髁C型骨折患者59例,双钢板垂直组27例;Y形钢板组15例;双钢板平行组17例。对比术中出血量和手术时间;术后并发症、骨折愈合时间;术后肘关节功能恢复情况。结果:所有患者随访3~12个月,Mayo肘关节功能评估:A组优18例、良6例、可2例、差1例;优良率88.89%。B组优4例、良5例、可4例、差2例;优良率60.00%。C组优11例、良4例、可1例、差1例;优良率88.23%。结论:锁定联合非锁定双重建钛板垂直固定较Y形钢板和双钢板平行固定治疗肱骨髁间骨折术后功能恢复好。
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of three kinds of different fixation methods(locking and non locking plates,Y-type steel plate and double plates) for intercondylar humeral fractures via the triceps tongue shaped flap approach.Methods:Fifty nine patients with adult humeral intercondylar fracture were divided into three groups.The locking and non locking plates vertical fixed group has 27 cases,Y-shape plate fixed group includes 27 cases,and the double plates parallel fixed group contains 17 cases.The following aspects were analyzed:bleeding during operation,operation time,postoperative complications,the time of fracture healing,postoperative function of elbow joint.Results:All patients were followed up for 3-12 months.According to Mayo elbow scoring system,A group:excellent in 18 cases,good in 6 cases,fair in 2 cases and poor in 1 cases,the excellent and good rate was 88.89%.B group:excellent in 4 cases,good in 5 cases,fair in 4 cases and poor in 2 cases,the excellent and good rate was 60.00%.C group:excellent in 11 cases,good in 4 cases,fair in 1 cases and poor in 1cases,the excellent and good rate was 88.23%.Conclusions:Comparing with the Y-shape plate fixation and the double plates parallel fixation,treatment of comminuted humeral intercondylar fracture(Type C) using the locking and non locking plates vertical fixation technique has good therapeutic effects.
出处
《黑龙江医药科学》
2017年第4期40-42,共3页
Heilongjiang Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
佳木斯大学科研项目
编号:13Z1201546
关键词
锁定联合非锁定双重建钛板垂直固定
Y形钢板
双钢板平行固定
肱骨髁C型骨折
the locking and non locking plates vertical fixation-shaped plate
the double plates parallel fixation
humeral intercondylar fractures(Type C)