期刊文献+

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的研究进展 被引量:5

Research progress of transanal total mesorectal excision
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(transanal total mesorectal excision,TaTME)的研究进展。方法收集国内外的相关研究成果,对TaTME的开展现状、面临问题、应用前景等进行综述。结果 TaTME延续了全直肠系膜切除术(total mesorectal excision,TME)的手术原则,借助腹腔镜的平台,采用"自下而上"的手术人路,可确保足够的肿瘤远切缘、提高直肠系膜标本质量、降低环周切缘阳性率、降低盆腔神经损伤发生率及提高保肛率,但同时也面临新技术带来的新并发症,以及肿瘤学预后和功能学转归不明确问题。结论TaTME节术尚处于起步阶段,其手术的安全性、可行性和短期疗效研究取得了令人满意的结果,但在广泛应用之前,仍需多中心、大样本和长期随访研究进一步验证其远期预后和肿瘤学安全性、 Objective To summarize the research progress oftransanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Methods The literatures about current status, limitations, and prospects of TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make an reviewe. Results TaTME is conformed to the principle of total mesorectal excision (TME), by using the 'bottom-up' approach and assisting in the laparoscopic technique platform, to ensure an adequate oncological distal margin, and it could improve the quality of the mesorectum specimens, reduce the circumferential margin involvement rate, afford more precise autonomic nerve preservation rate, and increase sphincter preservation rate. But it is also facing new complications, oncological and functional outcomes problems. Conclusions Although the experience with TaTME remains limited, the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes are acceptable. Nevertheless, there is a need for multicenter, large sample size, and long-term follow-up clinical studies focusing on the long-term outcomes to further improve the oncological safety of TaTME, before widespread application can be recommended.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2017年第11期1408-1413,共6页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
基金 四川省医学科研课题计划(项目编号:S15049)
关键词 经肛门全直肠系膜切除术 直肠癌 肿瘤学预后 功能学转归 综述 transanal total mesorectal excision rectal cancer oncological outcome functional outcome review
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(5):1205-1210.
  • 2Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of faecal ineontinence[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,1993,36(1):77-97.
  • 3Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10):613- 616.
  • 4Enker WE. Total mesorectal excision--the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Ann Med, 1997, 29(2):127-133.
  • 5Yu DS, Huang XE, Zhou JN. Comparative study on the value of anal preserving surgery for aged people with low rectal carcinoma in Jiangsu, China[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2012, 13(5):2339-2340.
  • 6Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ, et al. Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance,epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(2):256-263.
  • 7Tomita R, Igarashi S. A pathophysiological study using anorectal manometry on patients with or without soiling 5 years or more after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2008, 55(86/87):1584-1588.
  • 8Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, et al. A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(9):3396-3405.
  • 9Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, van der Peet DL, et al. Feasibility study of transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(6):828-831.
  • 10Tuech JJ, Bridoux V, Kianifard B, et al. Natural orifice total mesorectal excision using transanal port and laparoscopic assistance[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(4):334-335.

共引文献46

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部