期刊文献+

3.0T MRI水通道蛋白分子成像在胰腺癌的应用价值 被引量:3

The application value of 3.0T MRI molecular imaging of aquaporins in pancreatic cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨3.0T MRI水通道蛋白分子成像定量参数(ADC_(AQPs))在胰腺癌的应用价值。方法:采用GE Discovery MR750 3.0T磁共振扫描仪对临床或手术病理证实的37例胰腺癌患者行胰腺多b值DWI。应用水通道蛋白AQPs模型、非高斯IVIM双指数模型和拉伸指数模型分析多b值DWI,测量胰腺癌和非癌胰腺组织的水通道蛋白扩散系数(ADC_(AQPs))、纯扩散系数(ADC_(slow))和分布扩散系数(DDC),采用独立样本t检验进行统计学分析。结果:胰腺癌的ADC_(AQPs)值和ADC_(slow)值明显高于非癌胰腺组织(0.346vs.0.202μm^2/ms,P<0.001;0.611vs 0.521×10^(-3) mm^2/s,P=0.037),胰腺癌的DDC值明显低于非癌胰腺组织(1.244vs 1.679×10^(-3) mm^2/s,P=0.013),差异均有统计学意义。与ADC_(slow)和DDC相比,ADC_(AQPs)鉴别胰腺癌和非癌胰腺组织时的诊断效能更高(0.890>0.699>0.640)。胰腺癌的ADC_(AQPs)值和ADC_(slow)值呈正相关(r=0.414,P=0.015)。结论:水通道蛋白扩散系数ADC_(AQPs)和非高斯模型DWI扩散系数(ADC_(slow)、DDC)可以有效鉴别胰腺癌和非癌胰腺组织,ADC_(AQPs)是鉴别胰腺癌和非癌胰腺组织的最佳参数,3.0T MRI水通道蛋白分子成像是无创性早期诊断和鉴别胰腺癌与非癌胰腺组织的理想方法之一。 Objective:To explore the application value of quantitative parameters derived from 3.0T MRI molecular imaging of aquaporins in pancreatic cancer. Methods:Subjects that comprised of 37 patients with pancreatic cancer confirmed by clinical or surgery were included. Pancreas multiple h-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using GE Discovery MR750 3.0T scanner. ADCAQP, were calculated using AQPs diffusion model. Pure diffusion constant (ADCslow) were calculated using non-Gaussian IVIM diffusion model. Distribute diffusion constant (DDC) were calculated using non- Gaussian stretched exponential diffusion model. Parameters of pancreatic cancers and non-tumorous pancreas were compared using Independent Samples t Test. The P value 〈0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mean ADCAQPs and ADCslow value of pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than that of non-tumorous pancreas (0. 346 vs 0. 202μm^2/ms,P〈0.001 ;0. 611 vs 0. 521 × 10^-3mm^2/s, P= 0. 037 ;respectively). Mean DDC values of pancreatic cancer were significantly lower than those of non-tumorous pancreas (1. 244 vs 1. 679×10^-3mm^2/s, P= 0. 013). The diagnostic performance of ADCAQPs in differentiating pancreatic cancer from non-tumorous pancreas was the highest compared with ADCslow and DDC (0. 890〉0. 699〉 0. 640). ADCAQPs of pancreatic cancer was positively correlated to ADCslow (r= 0. 414, P= 0. 015). Conclusions: Diffusion coefficients derived from AQPs molecular imaging (ADCAQPs) and non-Gaussian model DWI (ADCslow ,DDC) can distinguish pancreatic cancer from non-tumorous pancreas. ADCAQPs value is the optimal parameter. 3. 0T MRI molecular imaging of aquaporins may be a promising and non invasive tool for early diagnosing and differentiating pancreatic carcinoma.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2017年第11期1165-1169,共5页 Radiologic Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金重大国际(地区)合作与交流项目(81220108011) 国家自然科学基金青年面上连续项目(81370039)
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 水通道蛋白 纯扩散系数 分布扩散系数 Pancreatic neoplasms Aquaporins Pure diffusion coefficient Distribute diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1郭富强,徐玉川,陈隆益,杨友松,董凌琳,代红源,黄雨兰,韦永胜,李晓佳,吴文斌,曾宪容,唐建,赵冬冬,YANG,Zheng-lin,杨果.脑出血患者血肿周围组织水通道蛋白-4表达与脑水肿及病理超微结构变化的关系[J].中华危重病急救医学,2008,20(11). 被引量:15
  • 2Fang WANG Xue-chao FENG Yong-ming LI Hong YANG Tong-hui MA.Aquaporins as potential drug targets[J].Acta Pharmacologica Sinica,2006,27(4):395-401. 被引量:21
  • 3王秋实,郭启勇,梁长虹,刘辉,廖伟.MR弥散加权成像在兔肝纤维化模型中的初步实验研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(7):952-955. 被引量:23
  • 4Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ. Whole -body diffusionweighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions[J]. Radiology, 2011, 261(3): 700-718.
  • 5Agre P, Sasaki S, Chrispeels MJ. Aquaporins a family of water channel proteins [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 1993, 3(265): F461.
  • 6Zhu FQ, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K. Theory and simulation of water permeation in aquaporin-l[J]. Biophys J, 2004, 86(1): 50- 57.
  • 7Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurology disorders[J]. Radiology, 1986, 161(2): 401- 407.
  • 8Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study [J]. Radiology, 2008, 249(3): 891-899.
  • 9Benga G. Waterchannel proteins (later called aquaporins) and relatives: past, present, and future [J]. IUBMB Life, 2009, 61 (2): 112-133.
  • 10Afdhal NH, Nunes D. Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review[j]. Am J Gastmenterol, 2004, 99(6): 1160-1174.

共引文献118

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部