期刊文献+

论共同体道德债务

下载PDF
导出
摘要 共同体道德债务是真实却被忽略了的伦理事实,表征着共同体之间道德权利与道德义务的非平衡关系,其有效性取决于债权人与债务人之间"承认共识"的达成。共同体道德债务可能因伤害产生,因奉献生成,亦可能是纯粹基于身份的先在规定,分别形成伤害性共同体道德债务、奉献性共同体道德债务和先在性共同体道德债务。物性偿债与灵性偿债是共同体道德债务清偿的基本方式,生命偿债则是共同体道德债务清偿的最高形式。道德债务之于共同体并非绝对的熵性存在,作为实存的伦理资源,道德债务可以实现共同体的精神集成,促成共同体的有机团结,还可以在共同体内实现有效的社会动员,为共同体发展集聚精神动力,而道德债务的加载、清偿、转移或遗忘,则可以成为共同体治理的价值工具。
作者 罗明星
出处 《社会科学动态》 2017年第11期5-10,共6页
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"中国特色社会主义实践与主流意识形态建构研究"(16JJD710016)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献43

  • 1Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994).Guilt: An .interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
  • 2Berndsen, M, & McGarty, C. (2010).The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 500-513.
  • 3Bransnmbe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup's negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L.Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669-684.
  • 5Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra Culpa: Collective guilt as a predictor for reparation for historical wrong-doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75-90.
  • 6Doosje, B. & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
  • 7Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-876.
  • 8Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effect of ingroup identification. Group processes and intergroup relations, 9, 325-338.
  • 9Ferguson, M. A. (2008). Collective guilt for harming future ingroup members: the case of American identity and global warning. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. University of Kansas, Kansas, USA.
  • 10Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部