期刊文献+

安氏II类1分类单双颌前磨牙减数对下颌第三磨牙影响的CBCT研究 被引量:2

Effect of Upper Jaw or Double Jaw Premolar Extraction of Class II Division I Malocclusion Patients on Mandibular Third Molar Eruption with Cone Beam CT Images
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨安氏II类1分类患者单颌拔牙与双颌拔牙正畸治疗对下颌第三磨牙(M3)萌出的影响。方法:选取安氏II类1分类65例,上颌单颌前磨牙减数32例,双颌前磨牙减数33例。在治疗前后拍摄CBCT,NNT viewer中3D重建,测量M3的轴倾角度(LM3)和下颌第二磨牙(M2)远中间隙,以及M2之间、M3之间的宽度,治疗前后数据进行配对t检验。结果:单颌拔牙组左LM3增加(P<0.01);双颌拔牙组右LM3减少(P<0.01),M2远中间隙增加(P<0.001),M3间距减少(P<0.001)。结论:单颌拔牙可能会增加M3阻生机率;双颌拔牙可能会增加M3正常萌出机率。 Objective: To compare the effect of upper jaw or double jaw orthodontic extraction of Class II division I malocclusion patients on mandibular third molar (M3) eruption. Methods: Sixty--five patients with Class II division I malocclusion were chosen for orthodontic treatment, within upper jaw premolars extraction in 32 cases and double jaw premolars extraction in 33 cases. The Cone beam CT images were taken before and after treatment, 3D images were then created using Software NNT viewer. Measurements included the angle between the M3 axis and the man- dibular occlusal plan (LM3), the mandibular second molar (M2) distal space, as well as the width between M2s and M3s. The data before and after treatment were analyzed by paired t test. Results.. In upper jaw extraction group, left LM3 increased (P〈0.01) ; while in double jaw extraction group, right LM3 reduced (P〈0.01), the M2 distal space added (P〈0. 001), and the width of M3s decreased (P〈0. 001). Conclusion: Upper jaw extractions might increase the rate of M3 impaction; in contrast, double jaw extractions might enhance the rate of M3 normal erup- tion.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第10期1110-1113,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 南京市医学科技发展专项资金(编号:YKK16163 YKK16160) 江苏省青年医学人才(编号:QNRC2016116)
关键词 Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合] 正畸拔牙 下颌第三磨牙 CBCT Class II division I malocclusion Orthodontic extractions Mandibular third molar CBCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献79

  • 1宋宇,周彦恒,林久祥.上前牙厚度对咬合关系的影响[J].口腔正畸学,2004,11(4):177-179. 被引量:5
  • 2庞光明,周宏原.上颌单颌拔牙矫治成人安氏Ⅱ~1错的回顾性研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(9):554-555. 被引量:1
  • 3SCOTT CONLEY R, JERNIGAN C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class Ⅱ camouflage therapy[J]. Angle Orthod, 2006,76 (1) : 59-65.
  • 4BISHARA SE, CUMMINS DM, JAKOBSEN JR, et al. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class Ⅱ, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995,107(1) :28-37.
  • 5DEMIR A, UYSAL T, SARI Z, et al. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class Ⅱ division 1 mandibular retrognathicpatients[J]. EurJ Orthod, 2005,27(5):524-31.
  • 6RUDEE DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontictherapy[J]. AmJ Orthod,1964,50(6):421-434.
  • 7TADIC N, WOODS MG. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class Ⅱ treatment[J]. Angle Orthod, 2007, 77(5) :808-816.
  • 8Hattab FN, Alhaija ES. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar eruption space [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999, 88 (3) : 285 - 291.
  • 9Gooris CG, Artun J, Joondeph DR. Eruption of mandibular third molars after second-molar extractions: A radiographic study[ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1990, 98 (2) : 161 - 167.
  • 10Staggers JA, Germane N, Fortson WM. A comparison of the effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulation [J]. Angle Orthod, 1992, 62(2) : 135 - 138.

共引文献50

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部