期刊文献+

限制性会阴侧切及降低分娩出血中新法接生技术的应用研究 被引量:3

Study on the application of new midwifery technique in limited episiotomy and reducing labor bleeding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨限制性会阴侧切及降低分娩出血中新法接生技术的应用。方法选取我院产科2016年01月~2016年12月收治的产妇1836例,其中阴道试产顺产915例,以电脑随机的方式分为研究组与常规组,各457例,对比分析传统接生技术(常规组)与新法接生技术(研究组)在减少产后出血量、会阴侧切率、切口感染率方面的效果。结果研究组在减少产后出血量、会阴侧切率、切口感染率等方面,低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新法接生技术能够减少产后出血量、降低会阴侧切率、切口感染率,尽量完整保护会阴部,以促进产妇产后良好恢复。 Objective To investigate the application of new delivery technique in limited episiotomy and reducing labor bleeding. Methods Obstetrics department in our hospital from 2016 01 to December 2016 from the maternal 1836 cases, including 915 Cases of vaginal delivery, the computer randomly divided into study group and control group, each of 457 cases, comparative analysis of traditional delivery technology (conventional group) and midwifery Technology (Study Group) to reduce the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, perineal side the effect of shear rate, rate of incision infection.Results The study group was lower than the conventional group in reducing the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, the rate of episiotomy and the rate of incision infection, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion The new technique can reduce the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, reduce the rate of episiotomy and the rate of incision infection, and protect the perineum as much as possible so as to promote the good recovery of the postpartum women.
作者 李燕
出处 《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》 2017年第14期10-11,共2页 Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
关键词 会阴侧切 产后出血量 新法接生技术 Episiotomy Postpartum hemorrhage New delivery technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 2Thacker S B,Banta H D. Benefits and risks of episioto- my: An interpretative review of the English language lit- erature, 1860-1980 [J]. Obstet Gyneeol Surv, 1983, 38 (6) : 322-338.
  • 3Harrison R F,Brennan M,North P M,et al. Is routine episiotomy necessary? [J]. Br Med J, 1984,288 (6435) : 1971-1975.
  • 4Woolley R J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: A review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part Ⅰ[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,1995,50(11) :806-820.
  • 5谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 6Sherry Boschert. Hands off the perineum during delivery [ J]. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey,2010,65 ( 2 ) :71.
  • 7Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, et al. Episiotomy in the U- nited States: has anything changed [ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009( 1 ) ,200: 573.
  • 8Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse Met al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal tratrauma [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011 ,7( 12): 66.
  • 9Sharon N, Bilenko N, Mazor Met al. The impact of changing the approach of performing episiotomy on perineal trauma in primip- arous: a comparison between two periods with different episioto- my rates [ J ]. Harefuah ,2011,150( 11 ) : 824.
  • 10Walker C, Rodriguez T, Herranz Aet al. Alternative modelof birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perine- ahrauma [ J ]. Int Uro-necol J ,2012,2:38 - 39.

共引文献287

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部