摘要
目的:探讨Deluxe-PS型与PFC Sigma RP型假体在膝关节置换中的应用效果。方法:选择在某院进行治疗的102例膝关节炎患者,按入院顺序分甲组、乙组,每组51例。甲乙2组患者均通过膝关节置换术进行治疗,甲组患者选用Deluxe-PS型假体,乙组患者选用PFC Sigma RP型假体,评价甲乙2组患者的中出血量、手术时间、KSS评分、膝关节活动度、HSS评分、假体屈曲角度以及外翻角。结果:乙组患者的术中出血量、手术时间均高于甲组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。乙组患者的KSS评分、膝关节活动度、HSS评分、假体屈曲角度以及外翻角均少于甲组,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在膝关节置换中,Deluxe-PS型假体同PFC Sigma RP型假体的应用效果相当,可很好实现假体同骨截面高精度的结合,提高假体同截骨覆盖面融合的适合性,但Deluxe-PS型假体的手术时间短和术中出血量少,值得推广。
Objective:To compare the effect of Deluxe-PS and PFC RP Sigma prostheses in total knee arthroplasty.Methods:102 cases of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were selected for the study and divided,according to the order of admission,into two groups,51 cases in each.Patients in group A were treated with knee arthroplasty using Deluxe-PS prosthesis,and group B using PFC Sigma RP prosthesis.The two groups of patients were then evaluated in terms of bleeding volume,operation time,KSS score,knee joint,HSS score,prosthesis flexion angle and valgus angle.Results:Bleeding volume and operation time in patients of group B were higher or longer than in patients of group A,the difference being statistically significant(P〈0.05).KSS score,knee joint,HSS score,prosthesis flexion angle and valgus angle in patients of group B were lower or less than patients in group A,but the difference was not statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion:In total knee arthroplasty,application of Deluxe-PS prosthesis and PFC Sigma RP prosthesis can both achieve very good effect,but the operation time of Deluxe-PS prosthesis is shorter and the intra-operative blood loss is less.So it is worth to be clinically promoted.
作者
葛建智
GE Jian-zhi(Songxian People's Hospital, Henan 471434, China)
出处
《淮海医药》
CAS
2017年第6期637-638,641,共3页
Journal of Huaihai Medicine