期刊文献+

配偶离婚时联合购买住房的估价方法探析——以中美法比较为线索展开 被引量:1

An Analysis on Valuation Methods in Joint-Fund Paid House for Divorce Couples:Comparison between Chinese and American Rules
原文传递
导出
摘要 "联合购买住房"即夫妻一方于婚前购买、婚后以共有资金或者婚姻资金偿还抵押贷款、所有权登记在夫妻一方名下的住房。在美国很多州,"联合购买住房"部分所有权被认定为个人财产;部分所有权被认定为"婚姻财产"或共有财产。20世纪70年代末期以来,对于所有权方配偶或婚姻共同体的所有权份额进行估价的方法被创造出来。这些方法是:摩尔—马斯登案估价法、马姆奎斯特案估价法、伍斯南—施密茨案估价法、勃兰登堡—米什勒案估价法、基林案估价法。在我国,从地方各级人民法院的司法实践,可以归纳出八类估价方法,但是它们各有不足。有鉴于此,我国司法实践可以借鉴得到完善的勃兰登堡—米什勒案估价法。 The house purchased with a joint and separate fund means that,a spouse buys the house before marriage but its secured debts are repaid by the couple's joint fund during marriage,and its ownership is registered under the purchaser.In many American states housing is characterized as that some shares are owned by one spouse while other shares are owned by both of the couple.Since the late 1970s,valuation methods with regard to share of a spouse or joint property have been created.There exist now Moore v.Moore and Marsden v.Marsden valuation methods,Malmquist v.Malmquist valuation method,Woosnam v.Woosnam and Schmitz v.Schmitz valuation methods,Brandenburg v.Brandenburg and Mishler v.Milshler valuation methods,and Keeling v.Keeling valuation method.In China there currently exist eight kinds of valuation methods created by People's Supreme Court and Local courts.They have some drawbacks to some extent.We should introduce Brandenburg v.Brandenburg and Mishler v.Milshler valuation methods to make some improvements.
作者 张学军
机构地区 苏州大学法学院
出处 《吉林大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期17-28,共12页 Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(17BFX136)
关键词 财产分割 联合购买住房 离婚 按份共有 housing purchased with a joint and separate fund divorce co-ownership by shares property distribution proposal for legislation
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部