期刊文献+

45~59岁中老年企业员工与公务员血糖及糖尿病风险预测值的比较研究

A comparative study of blood glucose and diabetes risk of 45-59 years Old on employees and Civil servants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较企业员工与公务员等不同阶层45~59岁中老年人群血糖及糖尿病风险预测值,分析其工作性质、生活习惯及社会学影响,为采取应对措施提供理论依据.方法:以305名以体力劳动为主的企业员工和长时间伏案工作为主的行政公务员为研究对象,抽取晨空腹静脉血5ML对血糖(Glu)进行测试并使用法国eZscan糖尿病风险评估仪对其未来5~10年患糖尿病的风险值进行测试及分析.结果:1.男女公务员血糖(Glu)值显著高于男女企业员工,均有非常显著性差异(P<0.01);2.男女公务员的糖尿病风险预测值均高于男女企业员工,男子之间有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),女子之间有显著性差异(P<0.05).结论:男女公务员Glu值及糖尿病风险预测值均高于男女企业员工,说明公务员患糖尿病的风险可能较企业员工高. Objective: To predict the comparison of employees and civil servants aged 45--59 years old in different levels of blood glucose and diabetes risk, analyzing living habit and social effects of their work, then provide a theoretical basis for relative actions. Methods: Take 305 physical labors and long time office working civil servants as the research subjects. Take 5ML morning fasting blood to masure blood glucose (Glu) and test the risks of diabetes in the future 5--10 using the French eZscan diabetes risk assessment instrument. Results: 1. Male and female civil servants blood glucose (Glu) are significantly higher than that of male and female employees, there are significant differences(P〈0.01) ; 2. Male and female civil servants diabetes risk prediction values are higher than male and female employees, there is a significant difference between men (P〈0.01) and women(P〈0.05). Conclusion: The Glu value and diabetes risk prediction value of male and female civil servants are higher than that of male and female employees, indi- cating that the risk of diabetes among civil servants is higher than that of employees.
出处 《青海师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 2017年第3期72-75,共4页 Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家体育总局项目(项目编号:2015B074)
关键词 中老年 血糖 糖尿病风险预测 比较研究 middle-aged people blood glucose diabetes risk prediction comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1叶任高,陆再英,谢毅.内科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:384.
  • 2赵雷.2型糖尿病合并骨质疏松症发病机制的研究进展[J].医药前沿,2012,2(13):56-57.
  • 3International Diabetes Federation. The global burden:diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)[EB/OL].http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the-globalburden,2012.
  • 4Yang W,Lu J,Weng J. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2010.1090-1101.
  • 5Preis SR,Hwang SJ,Coady S. Trends in all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among women and men with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study,1950 to 2005[J].Circulation,2009.1728-1735.
  • 6Boussageon R,Bejan-Angoulvant T,Saadatian-Elahi M. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality,cardiovascular death,and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes:meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].British Medical Journal,2011.d4169.
  • 7Gaede P,Lund-Andersen H,Parving HH. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2008.580-591.
  • 8Crasto W,Jarvis J,Khunti K. Multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria:the Microalbuminuria Education and Medication Optimisation (MEMO) study[J].Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,2011.328-336.
  • 9Ameirican Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012[J].Diabetes Care,2012,(Suppl 1):S11-S63.
  • 10Stratton IM,Adler AI,Neil HA. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35):prospective observational study[J].British Medical Journal,2000.405-412.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部