刑事庭审实质化改革：解析与检视

Reform of Criminal Trial Substantiation: Analysis and Review

在以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的语境下,刑事庭审实质化之提出、推行有其现实合理性、正当性与必要性。然而,由于概念用语存在不确定性与歧义,庭审实质化之使用可能遮蔽各项改革举措力图回归庭审本原状态的初心,代之以"庭审中心化"的表述更为准确;从改革举措的内容看,刑事庭审实质化事实上已经不限于有关庭审活动的技术性修正,存在名实不副的瑕疵;检视改革实践,刑事庭审实质化取得了一定成效,但受制于试点范围的局限性与试点时间的短暂性等因素,过高的评价显得并不妥当。

Under the context of the trial-centered criminal action system reform,the propose and implementation of criminal trial substantiation have its reasonability,justification and necessity. Due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of the concept,the use of trial substantiation may undermine various reform actions that try to return to the original state of trials,hence,the statement of "trial centralization"is more precise; in terms of the content of reform measures,criminal trial substantiation is in fact not limited to technical amendments to trial activities and actual defects have been identified; to review the reform practice,certain fruits have been achieved for criminal trial substantiation,but it is limited to limitations of trial substantiation of pilot range and temporariness of pilot time,the too-high comments are inappropriate.