期刊文献+

锁定加压钢板固定术与交锁髓内钉固定术治疗肱骨干中段骨折的疗效比较研究 被引量:4

Comparative effectiveness research of locking compression plate fixation and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation in treating middle humeral shaft fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较锁定加压钢板固定术与交锁髓内钉固定术治疗肱骨干中段骨折的临床疗效。方法选择长沙市中医院2014年2月—2016年2月收治的肱骨干中段骨折患者78例,随机分为对照组和试验组,各39例。对照组患者采用交锁髓内钉固定术治疗,试验组患者采用锁定加压钢板固定术治疗。比较两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间及术后并发症发生情况,随访6个月,评估比较两组患者肩关节功能恢复情况。结果两组患者术中出血量、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组患者住院时间、骨折愈合时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组患者肩关节功能优良率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用锁定加压钢板固定术治疗肱骨干中段骨折的临床效果优于交锁髓内钉内固定术,其可更有效缩短患者住院时间,促进肩关节功能恢复,且安全性好。 Objective To compare the efficacy of locking compression plate fixation and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of middle humeral shaft fracture. Methods A total of 78 cases of patients with middle humeral shaft fractures were admitted from February 2014 and February 2016 in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Changsha,which were randomly divided into control group and experimental group,39 cases in each group. The control group was treated with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation, while the experimental group was treated with locking compression plate fixation. The intraoperatve blood loss,surgery duration,hospital stays,fracture healing time and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Followed-up for 6 months,recovery of shoulder joints of patients were evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant differences of intraoperatve blood loss or surgery duration between the two group( P 〉0. 05). The experimental group of hospital stays and fracture healing time were shorter than experimental group( P 〈 0. 05).The rate of complications of experimental group was lower than control group( P 〈 0. 05). The good rate of shoulder function recovery of experimental group was higher control group( P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation,locking compression plate fixation has a better clinical effect in the treatment of middle humeral shaft fracture,which can shorten hospital stays of patients,helps shoulder joints recovery,and with great safety.
作者 何杰
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2017年第30期38-39,43,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 肱骨干中段骨折 锁定加压钢板固定术 交锁髓内钉固定术 疗效比较研究 Middle humeral shaft fracture Locking compression plate fixation Interlocking intramedullary nail fixation Comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献59

  • 1秦练,陈琦,周赤兵.带锁髓内钉和锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(S1):50-51. 被引量:20
  • 2范小良,丁国民,陆凯.可膨胀髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折[J].国际骨科学杂志,2007,28(2):133-134. 被引量:5
  • 3王荣诗,黄富国,岑世强,项舟,张世琼,尚峥辉.肱骨干骨折内固定失败与骨折不愈合的相关分析及对策[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(4):292-294. 被引量:28
  • 4向峥,郭振河,李敬中,杨家辉,郑晓明.旋入式髓内钉微创治疗肱骨干骨折的疗效分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(12):898-900. 被引量:8
  • 5Gregory PR, Sanders RW. Compression plating versus intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1997, 5(4): 215-223.
  • 6Pickering RM, Crenshaw AH Jr, Zinar DM. Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Instr Course Lect, 2002, 51: 271-278.
  • 7Jovanovic A, Pirpiris M, Semirli H, et al. Fixion nails for humeral fractures. Injury, 2004, 35(11): 1140-1142.
  • 8Franck WM, Olivieri M, Jannasch O, et al. Expandable nail system for osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: preliminary results. J Trauma, 2003, 54(6): 1152-1158.
  • 9Mallick E, Hazarika S, Assad S, et al. The fixion nailing system for stabil ising diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: a two-year clinical experience. Acta Orthop Belg, 2008, 74(3): 308-316.
  • 10Apivatthakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury, 2005, 36(4): 530-538.

共引文献87

同被引文献57

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部