1Sloman S A.The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,1996,119:3-22
2Evans J S B T.Logical and human reasoning:An assessment of the deductive paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,2002,128:978-996
3Evans J S B T.In two minds:dual-process account of reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:454-459.
4Stanovich K E,West R F.Individual differences in reasoning:Implications for the rationality debate.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,2000,23:645-726
5Kahneman D,Frederick S.Representativeness revisited:Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.49-81
6Sloman S A.Two systems of reasoning.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.379-396
7Tversky A,Kahneman D.External versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review,1983,90:293-315
8Evans J S B T.The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning:extension and evaluation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2006,13:378-395
9Sherman J W.On building a better process model:It is not only how many,but which ones and by which means? Psychological Inquiry,2006,17:173-184
10Over D.Rationality and the normative/descriptive distinction.In:Koehler D J,Harvey N.Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making.UK:Blackwell Publishing,2004.3-18
