期刊文献+

改良TST治疗痔病的临床观察 被引量:1

Modified TST for Hemorrhoids:Clinical Observation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了探讨吻合器选择性痔切除术(改良TST)治疗痔病的临床疗效及手术操作技巧,将2014年3~8月江苏省常熟市中医院肛肠科收治的120例痔病患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各60例。治疗组采用改良TST治疗,对照组采用PPH治疗。对比观察2组患者术后首次排便情况、并发症、住院时间、术后1个月的临床治愈率、术后2年内复发率情况。结果显示,2组患者术后1个月治愈率,治疗组为93.3%(56/60),对照组为90.0%(54/60)。差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。但2组患者术后首次排便通畅度、排便疼痛程度、出血、肛门坠胀、住院时间、术后2年内复发率情况,治疗组均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01或P〈0.05)。而在住院费用方面差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结果表明,与PPH相比,改良TST操作简单、疗效确切、术后并发症少,值得临床推广应用。 t This study was to explore the operative manipulation skill and clinical effect of stapler tissue-selecting therapy (modified TST) for hemorrhoids, randomly divided 120 cases of hemorrhoids who admitted in authors" department from March 2014 to August 2014 into treatment group and control one,60 cases for each;gave the modified TST to the former,meanwhile PPH to the latter;then compared both groups" fol- lowing indexes such as clinical curative rate, postoperative bowel movement at first time, complication and hospitalization time at 1 month after surgery,as well as recurrence rate status 2 years after surgery.As re- sults,in curative rate at 1 month after surgery there was no statistical difference(56/60,93.3% vs 54/60, 90.0%, P 〉0.05) between both groups,rest above-mentioned indexes the former was all superior to the latter,there was statistical difference( P 〈0.01 or P 〈0.05);what's more,in hospitalization cost there was no statistical difference( P 〉0.05).Results show that compared with PPH the modified TST has such merits as simple manipulation, cartain effect, and less complication, thus it is worthy of popularization and ical use.
作者 曹建峰 季利江 翁立平 卫军 CAO Jian-feng;JI Li-jiang;WENG Li-ping;WEI Jun(Coloproctological Dept. ,Changshu City's Hospital of TCM ,Changshu ,Jiangsu 215500)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2017年第9期20-22,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
基金 常熟市卫生局立项资助课题(CSWS201514)
关键词 吻合器选择性痔切除术 微创痔吻合术 术后并发症 临床观察 Hemorrhoid Stapler tissue-selecting therapy Minimally invasive anastomosis for hemorrhoid Postoperative complication Clinical observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2101
  • 2中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组 中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会 中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会.痔临床诊治指南(草案).中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463.
  • 3Mehigan BJ,Monson JRT,Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2000,355(9206):782- 785.
  • 4Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling for haemorrhoidectomy[J]. Lancet,2000,355(9206) :768-769.
  • 5Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapledwith open haemorrhoid- ectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2001,88(5) : 669.
  • 6Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, et al. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation alter STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,7(3):148-153.
  • 7Peseatori M, Dodi G,Salafia C, et al. Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation[J].Int J Coloreetal Dis, 2005,20 (1) : 83-85.
  • 8Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia R. Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicated by hematoma of the posterior vaginal wall[J]. Tech Coloproctol,2006,10(4):361-363.
  • 9史兆岐,中国大肠肛门病学,1985年,631页
  • 10Murie J A,Br J Surg,1982年,69卷,9期,536页

共引文献2440

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部