期刊文献+

改良护理方法在经桡动脉冠状动脉支架置入术后前臂血肿中的应用 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨改良护理方法在经桡动脉冠状动脉支架置入术后血肿处理中的应用效果. 方法 选取2014年11月至2016年10月解放军沈阳军区总医院心血管内科收治的167例经桡动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后前臂血肿患者,按入院时间顺序分为两组. 2014年11月1日至2015年3月31日收治的92例前臂血肿患者为常规护理组,对前臂血肿采用无菌纱布弹力绷带加压包扎. 2h后逐渐松解绷带,每隔2h松解1次,12h绷带减压完毕后,仍在局部以弹力绷带轻轻缠绕,24 h后完全解除. 2015年4月1日至2016年10月31日收治的75例前臂血肿患者为改良护理组,除常规加压包扎外,抬高患肢45°以上,12 h后患肢抬高15° -30°,24 h后完全解除绷带.观察穿刺侧皮肤的颜色,上肢麻木、上肢疼痛、皮肤水泡、再出血、术后24 h皮肤出血点、迷走反射及桡动脉急性闭塞的发生情况. 结果 改良护理组上肢麻木、上肢疼痛、手部发绀、皮肤水泡的发生率显著低于常规护理组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组患者的再出血、术后24 h皮肤出血点、迷走反射及桡动脉闭塞发生情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05). 结论 经桡动脉冠状动脉支架置入术后的前臂血肿,采取弹力绷带加压包扎,同时持续抬高患肢,可获得较好的临床护理效果.
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2017年第5期88-90,共3页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金指导计划(20170540960)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Dodson JA, Wang Y, Chaudhry SI, et al. Bleeding-avoidance strategies and outcomes in patients ≥ 80 years of age with ST- elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the NCDR CathPCI Registry) [ J]. Am J Cardiol,2012,110 : 1-6.
  • 2Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume : a substudy of the muhicenter randomized RIVAL trial [ J ]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6:258-266.
  • 3Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians[ J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ,2007,69:815-820.
  • 4Bertrand OF, Bagur R, Costerousse O, et al. Transradial vs femoral percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease in octogenarians[ J]. Indian Heart J,2010 ,62 :234-237.
  • 5Koutouzis M, Matejka G, Olivecrona G, et al. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians [ J ]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med ,2010,11:79-83.
  • 6Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians ( the OCTOPLUS study ) [ J ]. Am J Cardio1,2004,94 : 1177-1180.
  • 7Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/ non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[ J]. J Am Coil Cardio1,2007,50 : el -e157.
  • 8Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith Jr SC, et al. 2009 focused updates of the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update ) and the ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneons coronary intervention ( updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) : A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [ J ]. Circulation,2009,120:2271-2306.
  • 9Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2011,58 : e44-122.
  • 10Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, et al. The transradial approach to pereutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,55:2187-2195.

共引文献30

同被引文献94

引证文献9

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部