4McNamara JA Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in chil- dren 8-10 years of age [J]. Angle Orthod, 1981, 51 (3) : 177-202.
5Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, et al.Mandibular changes pro- duced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a sys- tematic review[J]. Am J Orhod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129 (5) : 599. el-12;discussion e 1-6.
6Decrue A, Wieslander L.Veranderungen der Fossa articularis nach Vorverlagerung der Mandibula mittels Herbstapparatur [J]. Zahnarztliche Praxis, 1990,41 (10) : 360-362,364-365.
7Paulsen I-IU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puber- ty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study [J]. Eur J Or- thod, 1997,19(6) : 657-668.
8Pullinger A, Hollender L.Assessment of mandibular condyle posi tion: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tome grams [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1985, 60 (3) 329-334.
9Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, et al.Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion [J]. Angle Orthod, 1996.66(1) : 27-35.
10Popowich K, Nebbe B, Major PW.Effect of Herbst treatment on temporomandibular joint morphology: a systematic literature re- view [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123 (4) : 388-394.
