黄侃训诂学与施莱尔马赫解释学之比较

A Comparison Between Huang Kan's Exegetics and Schleiermacher's Hermeneutics

黄侃训诂学与施莱尔马赫解释学具有相同性质的研究对象和研究方法,在各自的学术发展过程中又具有相当的历史地位,因此二者具有较强的可比性。黄侃在自己全面而精深的训诂实践的基础上,使训诂学最终摆脱了经学的附庸地位,成为一门研究一切"用语言解释语言"活动的特点、规律的独立学科;施莱尔马赫则在充分研究《圣经》和以柏拉图著作为代表的古典作品的基础上,提出了一个研究一切理解、解释古典作品的解释学体系。因此,二者在东西方解释理论的发展史上都具有开创性地位。由于历史渊源不同,黄侃训诂学和施莱尔马赫解释学在解释目标、发展路径上存在显著差异,具有较强的互补性。有鉴于此,主动吸收以施莱尔马赫为代表的西方解释学理论的合理因素,对于当今的训诂学建设具有较强的现实意义。

Since Huang Kan＇s exegetics and Schleiermacher＇s hermeneutics share research objects and research method with the same attributes,and occupy equivalent historical positions in respective course of academic development,they have a strong comparability.Huang Kan,on the basis of his comprehensive and profound exegetical practice,got the exegesis rid of the subordinate status of the classics,and made it an independent discipline that studied all the characteristics and laws of＂language interpreting language＂.And Schleiermacher proposed a hermeneutic system for studying and interpreting classical works based on a full study of the Bible and other classical works represented by Plato＇s works.Therefore,both of them are of creative significance in the eastern and the western development history of the interpretation theory.Due to different historical origins,Huang Kan＇s exegetics and Schleiermacher＇s hermeneutics have significant differences in the interpretation of the target and the development path,they have relatively strong complementarity.In view of this,it is of great practical significance for the present construction of exegetics theory to absorb actively the rational elements of the Western Hermeneutics theory represented by Schleiermacher.