摘要
(1)目的比较经皮锁定钢板内固定术与传统解剖钢板内固定术治疗胫骨下段骨折的效果。(2)方法选取我院在2015年6月~2016年6月收治的48例胫骨下段骨折患者进行临床研究。根据患者入院的时间先后顺序分为对照组和观察组,各24例。对照组采用传统解剖钢板内固定术,观察组采用经皮锁定钢板内固定术治疗。治疗结束后,对比两组患者的治疗总有效率、切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间以及住院时间。(3)结果两组患者手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者的治疗总有效率为95.83%(23/24),切口长度(14.50±1.73)cm、术中出血量(25.31±6.30)mL、住院时间(9.54±3.01)天,均优于对照组患者(70.83%)、(31.87±5.95)cm、(65.34±17.64)mL、(15.68±5.11)天,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(4)结论经皮锁定钢板内固定术治疗胫骨下段骨折临床效果显著,值得在临床中推广和应用。
Objective To compare the effect of percutaneous locking plate and traditional anatomic plate internal fixation for the treatment of distal tibial fractures.Methods A total of 48 patients with distal tibia fracture were selected from June 2015 to June 2016 in our hospital.According to the time of admission to hospital,they were divided into control group and observation group,each group had 24 patients.The control group were treated with traditional anatomic plate internal fixation,the observation group were treated with percutaneous locking plate.After the treatment,compared the total effective rate,incision length,intraoperative blood loss,operation time and hospital stay of the two groups.Results There was no statistical significance of operating time（P 0.05）,beyond that,the total effective rate（95.83%）,incision length,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in observation group were better than that in control group（P 0.05）.Conclusion The clinical effect of percutaneous locking plate for distal tibial fracture is remarkable,that is worth to promoting and applicating in clinical.
出处
《华北理工大学学报（医学版）》
2017年第6期440-442,共3页
Journal of North China University of Science and Technology：Health Sciences Edition
关键词
经皮锁定钢板内固定
传统解剖钢板内固定
胫骨下段骨折
P e r c u t a n e o u s l o c k i n gp l a t e i n t e r n a l f i x a t i o n. T r a d i t i o n a l a n a t o m i cp l a t e i n t e r n a l f i x -a t i o n. D i s t a l t i b i a l f r a c t u r e .
