论语音隐喻

On Phonetic Metaphors

文章通过分析与语音有关的词语和结构修辞格以及象征与隐喻的关系,发现"跨域喻指"隐喻理论解释与语音有关的词语修辞格理据性不足,目的域与始源域之间没有意义上的像似性,跨域也没有创造意义上的像似性,跨域只是建立在语音相似或相同的基础之上,可称之为语音转喻。跨域喻指可以解释与语音有关的结构修辞格,因为它们基于目的域与始源域之间的像似性。因此,语音修辞的语音隐喻之说,缺乏全面性和充分性的解释,而用像似性和象征性解释语音修辞更具理据性、全面性和充分性。

The paper discovers that the rationale for the explanation of lexical rhetoric concerning sounds isn＇t sufficient with metaphorical theory through analyzing lexical and structural rhetoric concerning sounds and relationship between symbolization and metaphor because there＇s no semantic iconicity between the target domain and the source domain, also no semantic emergence in domain-crossing projection, but domain-crossing is only based on the same or similar sounds, which can be called phonetic metonymy. Metaphorical theory can explain structural rhetoric concerning sounds because it is based on the iconicity between the target domain and the source domain. Therefore, the application of phonetic metaphor to phonetic rhetoric lacks comprehensiveness and sufficiency in explanation, but the application of symbolization and iconicity to phonetic rhetoric is more rational, comprehensive and sufficient.