中国法学界对南海仲裁案的法理解析

Jurisprudential Analysis of the South China Sea Arbitration Case by Chinese Lawyers

我国对南海断续线内的所有岛礁拥有领土主权。根据《国际海洋法公约》的法律规定,在2016年的南海仲裁案中,仲裁庭对涉及领土主权争端的"混合争议"无管辖权,裁决缺少充分的法理依据,裁决过程存在明显的法律缺陷。中国表明不参与、不接受、不承认的严正立场,重申中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益,中国在南海岛礁的建设是合法的。

China has territorial sovereignty over all islands and reefs in the intermittent line of the South China Sea.According to ＂The Legal Provisions of the International Convention on the Law of the Sea＂,in the South China Sea arbitration in 2016,the arbitration of having no sovereignty over the disputed territory for the excuse of ＂mixed dispute＂has no sufficient legal basis,legal defects exist in the arbitration process.China shows the solemn position that it does not participate,does not accept,does not recognize,reaffirms China＇s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea,and the construction of China＇s reefs in the South China Sea is legal.