基于双重渠道过程控制的同行评议研究

Research on Peer Review of Dual Channel Process Control

同行评议是对科学研究成果进行质量控制的重要举措。文章在分析评议过程公正性问题和透明度问题的基础上,对基于同行评议的文献进行了梳理,总结了现行同行评议体制中尚存在两个比较突出的问题:第一,在评议前,组织者可以利用权利,将被评议者的材料分配给与其关系密切的评议专家,从而间接地影响评议的公正性;第二,在评议中,每位评议专家的意见和结果,未经其他评议专家的交流与认可,因此没有达到群体决策的共识。文章针对以上两个问题,分别构建了评议前的"被评议者自选评议专家系统"和评议中的"评议专家相互逆判与集结系统",并在此基础上,整合为"双重渠道过程控制的同行评议系统"。最后,为提高同行评议质量,提出了相应的对策与建议。文章通过对双重渠道过程控制系统的研究,为科研项目、期刊论文、学位论文、人才项目等的评审,提供一种兼顾公平与效率的同行评议新模式。

In view of the problems existing in the current peer review system,apeer review system based on dual channel process control is constructed.Peer review is an important measure for the quality control of scientific research results.Based on analyzing the problems of fairness and transparency in review process,literature on peer review was reviewed.Then summarize two more prominent problems in the current peer review system.First,prior to the review,the evaluation organizers is entitled to assign the materials to their closely-related evaluation experts,indirectly affecting the fairness of the review.Second,during the review,the review options cannot get timely online evaluation,and not reach consensus in group decision making.According to the above two problems,construct the"system of authors choosing appraisal expert"and"system of review experts mutual adverse and judgment".On this basis,a system of dual channel process controlling is integrated.Finally,in order to improve the quality of peer review,the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are pointed out.Through the study of dual channel peer review system,a new model is provided for fairness and efficiency of peer review,as for scientific research projects,journal articles,degree papers,talent projects,etc.