期刊文献+

奎因哲学对“不可或缺论证”究竟意味着什么?

What does Quine mean to the Indispensability Argument?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "不可或缺论证"是当代数学哲学讨论的重要问题,也是关涉数学实在论成立与否的核心论证环节。在"不可或缺论证"的争论中,奎因的影响是至关重要的,其立场在这场争论中处于一个关键位置。奎因哲学,特别是其以自然主义为基础发展起来的确证整体论和本体论承诺命题,构成了"不可或缺论证"的基本理论框架,成为数学实在论辩护的主要理论依据。但由于奎因思想本身的复杂性以及其内在矛盾,这些理论框架又同时激发着反数学实在论的发展,即奎因哲学引导着"不可或缺论证"正反双方的逻辑发展路径。 The Indispensability Argument is one of the important issues in modern Philosophy of science which plays a crucial role in the argument for the realism of mathematics. in this discuss,The Indispensability argument attempts to draw conclusion from the applicability of mathematics to science,which comes mainly from Quine,especially from his ontologically committed thesis and holism. At the same time,the antirealism also get a lot from his thesis.
作者 贾向桐
机构地区 南开大学哲学院
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第12期64-71,共8页 Social Sciences of Beijing
基金 天津市哲学社会科学重点项目(TJZX17-001)
关键词 不可或缺论证 数学实在论 整体论 本体论承诺 the Indispensability Argument realism of mathematics Holism the Ontological Commitments
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1L. Bergstrom. Quine, Underdetermination, and Skepticism. The Journal of Philosophy. 1993 ( 7 ) , p. 331.
  • 2Martin Carrier, Underdetermination as an Epistemological Test Tube. Synthese, 2011 (180) , p. 194.
  • 3Rog6rio Passos Severo, Plausible Insofar as It ls Intelligible. Synthese. 2008 (161) , p. 142.
  • 4Martin Carrier, Underdetermination as an Epistemological Test Tube. Synthese, 2011 (180), p. 190, p. 192.
  • 5L. Laudan, Beyong Positivism and Relativism. Westviewpress. 1996, p. 63, p. 81, pp. 81-82.
  • 6Duhem Pierre, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1954, pp. 189-190.
  • 7Martin Carrier, Underdetermination as an Epistemological Test Tube. Synthese, 2011 ( 180), p. 190, p. 192.
  • 8W.V. Quine, Theories and Things. Harvard University Press, 1981, p.24, p. 24, p.2, p. 23, p.28.
  • 9W.V. Quine, On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World. Erkenntnis. 1975, 3, p.313, p.313, p. 318.
  • 10W.V. Quine, On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation, Jourml, l of Philosophy7, p. 179.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部