期刊文献+

利他型人寿保险中投保人与受益人的对价关系 被引量:9

The Consideration Relationship Between the Policyholder and the Beneficiary in Altruistic Life Insurance
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国的保险法理论与实务往往误读人寿保险金不属于被保险人遗产之法律规定,认为其专属于受益人,其他任何人均无权介入该保险金的处理。然而,在投保人与受益人非为同一人的利他型人寿保险契约中,受益人的保险金请求权虽然为其直接取得的权利,但该直接取得性并不能否定受益人与投保人之间的具体法律关系。依照民法利他型契约理论,一方面,受益人得直接向保险人请求保险金给付的权利源自保险契约,即投保人与保险人之间的补偿关系;另一方面,受益人能否最终取得保险金,还取决于投保人与受益人之间的对价关系是否存在。该对价关系与补偿关系相互独立,其法律性质为投保人对受益人的单方赠与行为。投保人及其财产关系人之间的利害关系调整应以该单方赠与行为为标准进行。投保人的债权人可依据民法有关债权人撤销权的规定撤销该赠与;受益人为共同继承人时,其他继承人可依照继承法的规定对保险金主张一定的权利。 In Chinese theory and practice of insurance law, the insurance compensation belongs ex- clusively to the beneficiary. Where the policyholder and the beneficiary are not the same person in al- truistic life insurance contract, the beneficiary' s direct fight to claim insurance compensation does not negate the specific legal relationship between the beneficiary and the policyholder. On the one hand, the beneficiary has the right to claim insurance compensation directly from the insurer accord- ing to insurance contract; on the other hand, whether the beneficiary can finally obtain insurance compensation will depend on the existence of the relationship between the policyholder and the benefi- ciary. Such consideration relationship is distinct from the compensation relationship, whose legal na- ture is a unilateral gift given by the policyholder to the beneficiary. The interest relationship between the policyholder and his property interested parties should be adjusted according to the standard of unilateral gift conduct. The creditor of the insured may revoke the gift in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Civil Law. When the beneficiary is a co-heir, other heirs may claim certain rights of insurance compensation in accordance with the Inheritance Law.
作者 岳卫
机构地区 南京大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期115-128,共14页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 江苏省保险学会2016年应用课题"利他型人寿保险的理论与实务"(SBX2016-2-C-01)的研究成果之一
关键词 人寿保险金 对价关系 债权人撤销权 共同继承人 life insurance compensation, consideration relationship, creditor' s revocation right, coheir
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献67

  • 1韩世远.试论向第三人履行的合同——对我国《合同法》第64条的解释[J].法律科学,2004,22(6):100-108. 被引量:51
  • 2王泽鉴.《民法物权》第1册[M].台湾三民书局,1992年版.第50-53页.
  • 3郑玉波.《民法债编总论》,三民书局,1970年版,第244—246页,第131页.
  • 4史尚宽.《债法总论》[M].台湾荣泰印书馆,1978年版.第141页.
  • 5郑玉波.《民法债编总论》[M].三民书局,1996年第15版.第329页.
  • 6Cfr., E,Betti, Interpretazione della Legge e degli Atti Giuridici, seconda edizione, Milano, 1971, 129ss.
  • 7Cfr., M. Talamanca, Istituzione di Diritto Romano, Milano, 1990, p. 514.
  • 8Cfr. , M. Talamanca, Obbligazioni(in diritto Romano), voce nella Enciclopedia del Diritto, Vol.29, Milano, 1979, p.24.
  • 9Cfr., V. Arangio-Ruiz, lstituzione di Diritto Romano, Nona edizione, Napoli, 1947, 284ss.
  • 10M. Kaser, Zur interessebestimmung bei den sog. Unechten Vertragen zugunsten dritter, in Festschrift fur SEIDL, Koln, 1975, 75ss.

共引文献153

同被引文献152

引证文献9

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部