对家畜伤人进行私力救济的责任承担及其处置——由连云港砍犬案引发的思考

On Responsibility of Private Remedy in Domestic Animals Attacking and Its Handling——Reflection on Case of Chopping Dog in Lianyungang

连云港砍犬案发生后,当地公安机关对该案进行了一系列处置,引发了一些争议。从公安机关承担的养犬审查职责来看,公安机关进行的仅是形式审查,对陈某骗取养犬许可证的违法行为不承担违法许可的责任,陈某应因弄虚作假骗取养犬许可证而受到行政处罚。陈某的犬属于野犬,王某有权捕杀,但应当对陈某承担赔偿责任。公安机关以故意毁坏财物罪追究王某责任和对其适用刑事拘留措施缺乏正当性。在处置家畜伤人类似案件时,公安机关应加强传舆论引导,转变执法理念,恪尽调查义务,强化联动机制。

Local public security organs conducted a series of handling after happening of case of chopping dog,provoking controversy among people. From the nature of investigating dog-keeping,public security organs only conduct formal investigation and do not undertake responsibility for breach of law in illegal behavior of swindling dog license conducted by Chen. Chen shall be imposed on administrative penalty for swindling dog license by use of trickery. His dog belongs to type of wild dog,so Wang has right to catch and kill it and some responsibility of compensation shall be undertaken by Wang. It is not proper to investigate Wang's responsibility for crime of intentionally damaging property and take criminal detention measures.When handling cases of domestic animail attacking,public security organs shall strengthen public opinion guidance,change concept of law enforcement,fulfill obligations of investigation and promote coordination mechanism.