期刊文献+

中美贸易失衡的一种新解读:基于要素贸易的视角 被引量:8

A New Interpretation of Sino-US Trade Balance Based on Factor Trade
原文传递
导出
摘要 中美贸易顺差一直是学术界和政府部门关注的热点问题。本文基于增加值贸易理论,利用1995-2009年世界投入产出表和社会经济账户,对中美贸易失衡进行了再测算;从要素贸易的视角,将中美增加值贸易失衡进一步分解为资本要素贸易失衡和劳动力(高技能、中等技能、低技能)要素贸易失衡。结果显示,相比于中美传统贸易顺差,1995、2009年中美增加值贸易顺差分别减少了18.4%和15.7%,同期中美制造业增加值贸易顺差分别减少了46.5%和47.9%,而中美农业贸易则由传统贸易逆差转变为增加值贸易顺差;在资本、劳动力要素贸易上,中国长期处于贸易顺差的地位,但中国在高技能劳动力要素贸易上表现为贸易逆差,且逆差规模持续扩大,高技能劳动要素贸易逆差主要来源于制造业和服务业。 Sino-US trade surplus has roused extensive attention from the academics and governments. Based on trade in value added,this paper re-computes Sino-US trade balance with 1995-2009 World Input-Output Tables and Socio Economic Accounts. From the perspective of factor trade,it decomposes value added trade balance into capital trade balance and labor( high-skilled,medium-skilled,low-skilled) trade balance. The results reveal that: compared to traditional Sino-US trade surplus,Sino-US value added trade surplus decreased by 46. 5% and 47. 9% respectively in 1995 and 2009,and during the same period,value added trade surplus in manufacturing decreased by 46. 5% and 47. 9% respectively with trade balance in agriculture changing from traditional trade deficit to value added trade surplus. With regard to capital and labor trade with US,China shows a long-term trade surplus. However,when it comes to high-skilled labor trade,China shows an increasing trade deficit which mainly comes from manufacturing and services.
作者 韩中 凌亢
出处 《金融评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期44-57,共14页 Chinese Review of Financial Studies
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目<TPP外部约束下我国融入国际价值链分工战略研究>(16JZD019) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目<全球价值链视角下我国总出口的增加值分解研究>(16YJC910004)
关键词 全球价值链 增加值贸易 增加值出口 要素贸易 贸易失衡 Global Value Chains Trade in Value Added Value Added Export Factor Trade Trade Balance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1关兵.附加值贸易统计方法视角下的中国外贸发展状况[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报),2013,20(3):16-24. 被引量:12
  • 2北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组.中国出口贸易中的垂直专门化与中美贸易[J].世界经济,2006,29(5):3-11. 被引量:327
  • 3刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量:327
  • 4Daudin,G. , Rifflart, C. and D. Schweisguth, Who Economics, Vol. 44, No. 4,2011, pp. 1403 - 1437.
  • 5Hummels,D. , Ishii, J. and K. M. Yi, The Nature international Economics, Vol. 54, No. 1,2001, pp. 75 - 96.
  • 6Hummels,D. , Rapoport, D. and K. M. Yi, Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade. FRBNY Economic Policy Review ,June 1998, pp. 79- 99.
  • 7Johnson, R. C. and G. Noguera, Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 86, No. 2,2012, pp. 224- 236.
  • 8Koopman,R. , Powers, W. , Wang, Z. and S. J. Wei, Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Paper,No. 16426,2011.
  • 9Maurer, A. and C. Degain,Globalization and Trade Flows: What Yon See is not What You Get. WTO-Economic Research and Statistics Division Staff Working Paper, ERSD- 2010- 12,2010.
  • 10Stehrer, R, , Trade in Value Added and the Value Added in Trade. WIOD Working Paper, No. 8,2012.

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部